Our earlier attempt was jumping straight from asm to the old u-boot
board_init_f in lowlevel_init_c.c. We are getting ready to transition
to using a real bootblock for ARM, so add romstage.c to the files
compiled and we'll make main() our entry point.
This also updates romstage.ld to place main() (*(.text.startup)) at
the beginning of romstage.
Change-Id: Ifc77a6bfba27d915c4cad62c6c8040665294628a
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2163
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This replaces hard-coded bootblock offsets using the new scheme.
The assembler will place the initial branch instruction after BL1,
skip 2 aligned chunks, and place the remaining bootblock code after.
It will also leave an anchor string, currently 0xdeadbeef which
cbfstool will find. Once found, cbfstool will place the master CBFS
header at the next aligned offset.
Here is how it looks:
0x0000 |--------------|
| BL1 |
0x2000 |--------------|
| branch |
0x2000 + align |--------------|
| CBFS header |
0x2000 + align * 2 |--------------|
| bootblock |
|--------------|
TODO: The option for alignment passed into cbfstool has always been
64. Can we set it to 16 instead?
Change-Id: Icbe817cbd8a37f11990aaf060aab77d2dc113cb1
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2148
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This lays out the groundwork for using a proper bootblock on ARM.
Currently we bypass the bootblock entirely and go straight to
romstage. However we want to utilize CBFS to maximize flexibility
of placing code without relying on a lot of magic numbers which
will break depending on the SoC in use.
Change-Id: I9cc2a8191d2db38b27b6363ba673e5a360de9684
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2118
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
It's a bad Linux heritage.. We have no userland in firmware.
Change-Id: Ib19e5ba713078ca37514571213d19f418417b964
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2108
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
It makes no sense to have directories with one file.
Change-Id: I65ba93dda5e6a4bcc5a7cc049c1378ebf5d6abcd
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2105
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
This reverts commit ec8d35fe91
We are almost certain that this is not necessary.
Change-Id: I70e94f883be95655da00a0b127ed9ffd7c81c63b
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2104
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Our reference toolchain uses -mabi=aapcs whereas we started
forcing -mabi=aapcs-linux. Drop this to prevent ABI incompatibility.
Also drop -fno-common since that's set in the top level Makefile.inc
already.
Change-Id: I4afdcf5da9a5d86c2f9e5de5c7d523ccd2f5f1e0
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2103
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
This updates $CFLAGS used for armv7. Most of them were just added
to be consistent with what u-boot does. The important ones here
are -march=armv7-a and -mthumb (to allow 16-bit Thumb instructions).
I removed the hard float support because it got errors and
coreboot should never use floats anyway. We're still having trouble
with enums but I want to see how far it gets with this patch.
Also, put the flags in a form that makes diffs easier to read. It's
almost impossible otherwise.
Finally, move some flags to the architecture Makefile, and
rely on the fact that some are set for all architectures.
Depends-On: I6f730d017391f9ec4401cdfd34931c869df10a9e
Change-Id: Ia8a1ae22959933e06f7b996d1832cea40819f1ff
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2075
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This replaces a somewhat useless calculation used earlier (which
always evaluated to 0) with an offset to specify the location
of the Coreboot bootblock.
Change-Id: Ib85aaccf138cebeb6bf8aedf82308861206dff48
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2094
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
The old start.S file did a lot of work and had AP-specific #ifndef's.
The new init.S will eventually contain only bare minimum generic ARM
code for use by the bootblock. Processor-specific stuff and things
that take place later in the boot process should go elsewhere.
Change-Id: I7db0a77ee4bbad1ddecb193ea125d8941a50532b
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2083
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
While "payload none" is undesirable for instant flashing,
assume that it was a conscious user choice.
(more immediate: jenkins isn't happy with escape sequences)
Change-Id: I9958b34a037b4d10bb7dba893335a63917623a70
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2055
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
cbfstool was called with the wrong parameters
Change-Id: I405d0fd7c84b46da3c98a36fd19ef0034dc175cf
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2022
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
The first ARMv7 CPU we're going to support is the Exynos 5250
used in the Google Snow ChromeBook.
Change-Id: I4de8433bbc6202eb8fef2556a11186a3376d411b
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2004
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
