board_pciid_enables more readable.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Guilloux <stephan.guilloux@free.fr>
> What real problem does this solve?
1. Next time someone adds a new struct member, we avoid mistakes of
ordering of initializers
2. we avoid mistakes in the first place.
The .x = y stuff was added for a (good) reason, I think this is an
improvement.
Acked-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3861 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This board has 2x MX25L8005 flash chips behind an IT8718F LPC->SPI bridge.
The board uses GIGABYTE's patented BIOS failover technology, and at this point
we do not know how to control which of the two chips flashrom actually hits.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Yul Rottmann <yulrottmann@bitel.net>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3859 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
incorrect license section.
- Remove the copyright listings and refer the reader to the source
files.
- Update the author list to those which have copyright messages in the
source files.
- Correct the license from GPL v2+ to (GPL v2, with some files under
later versions as well)
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3852 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
flashchips.c over what's currently in flashrom HEAD.
The explicit initialization makes sure any future struct flashchip
reordering is not needed. (Except for the case where we need arrays
of some of the struct members.)
Signed-off-by: Stephan Guilloux <mailto:stephan.guilloux@free.fr>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3851 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Fix that by throwing an error instead.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3834 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
There seem to be at least two versions of the board out there, and the
subsystem IDs changed between the versions.
Patch successfully tested on hardware.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3833 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
* rename ich_check_opcodes to ich_init_opcodes.
* let ich_init_opcodes do not need to access flashchip structure:
. move the definition of struct preop_opcode_pair to a better place
. remove preop_opcode_pairs from 'struct flashchip'
. modify ich_init_opcodes and generate_opcodes so that they do not access the flashchip structure
* call ich_init_opcodes during chipset enable. Now OPCODES generation mechanism works.
* fix a coding style mistake.
Signed-off-by: FENG yu ning <fengyuning1984@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3814 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
support the MX29LV040C.
MX29LV040C probe and read support tested by khetzal on IRC.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3809 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This patch adds SB700 support to flashrom. The code for enabling the flash
rom is the same as for SB600. It was tested (read, write, verify) with an
ASUS M3A-H/HDMI which contains a Macronix MX25L8005.
Signed-off-by: Niels Ole Salscheider <niels_ole@salscheider-online.de>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3799 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Thanks to Niels Ole Salscheider for the problem report.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3798 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
flashrom used to exit 0 even if erase failed. Not anymore.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3797 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
SST_25VF512A_REMS
SST_25VF010_REMS
SST_25VF020_REMS
SST_25VF040_REMS
SST_25VF040B_REMS
SST_25VF080_REMS
SST_25VF080B_REMS
SST_25VF032B_REMS
SST_26VF016
SST_26VF032
W_25X16
W_25X32
W_25X64
Straight from the data sheets.
The REMS IDs help in case the RDID opcode is unavailable (due to opcode
lockdown) or unsupported by the chip.
Some day, we need to pair probe functions together with IDs. Multiple
pairs can exist per chip and duplicating chip definitions does not
really make sense.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3793 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Bug from r3791.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3792 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
If flashbase was set before probe_flash() it would only ever be used once, for
the very first flash chip probe.
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3791 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<Qingpei.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe, Bao <Zheng.Bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3782 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
unsupported functions, giving the user the impression that the
unsupported functions are tested.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3780 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This has been tested by Uwe Hermann on an RS690/SB600 board.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <Qingpei.Wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3779 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This is the first chip which uses the infrastructure for alternative
erase commands, namely spi_chip_erase_60_c7().
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <Qingpei.Wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Joe Bao <zheng.bao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3776 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
- probe_spi_rdid with opcode 0x9f, usually 3 bytes ID
- probe_spi_res with opcode 0xab, usually 1 byte ID
We are missing the following probe function:
- probe_spi_rems with opcode 0x90, usually 2 bytes ID
RDID provides best specifity (manufacturer, device class and device) and
RES is supported by quite a few old chips. However, RES only returns one
byte and there are multiple flash chips with different sizes on the
market and all of them have the same RES ID.
REMS is from the same age as RES, but it provides a manufacturer and a
device ID. It is therefore on par with the probing for parallel flash
chips and specific enough.
The order in which chips should be detected is as follows:
1. RDID
2. REMS
3. RES
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3775 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
which support all commands, but may not exist.
For controllers which support only a subset of commands, it will fail in
unexpected ways. Even if a command is supported by the controller, it
may be unavailable if the controller is locked down.
The new logic checks if RDID could be issued and its return values made
sense (not 0xff 0xff 0xff). In that case, RES probing is not performed.
Otherwise, we try RES.
There is one drawback: If RDID returned unexpected values, we don't
issue a RES probe. However, in that case we should try to match RDID
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: FENG yu ning <fengyuning1984@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3774 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
File util/flashrom/flash.h already had correct ID for that part.
Signed-off-by: Tero O Peippola <xeropp@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3769 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
SPI opcodes should be placed in which location. Move to a less
optimistic implementation and actually use the generic SPI read
functions. They're useful for abstracting exactly this stuff and that
makes them the preferred choice.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3758 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
does not have a mechanism to signal command failure, the SPI host may be
unable to send a given command over the wire due to security or hardware
limitations. The current code ignores these mechanisms completely and
simply assumes almost every command succeeds. Complain if SPI command
execution fails.
Since locked down Intel chipsets (like the one we had problems with
earlier) only allow a small subset of commands, find the common subset
of commands between the chipset and the ROM in the chip erase case. That
is accomplished by the new spi_chip_erase_60_c7() which can be used for
chips supporting both 0x60 and 0xc7 chip erase commands.
Both parts of the patch address problems seen in the real world. The
increased verbosity for the error case will help us diagnose and address
problems better.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Otherwise: Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3757 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
AT25DF021
AT25DF041A
AT25DF081
AT25DF161
AT25DF321A
AT25DF641
AT25F512B
AT25FS010
AT25FS040
AT26DF041
AT26DF081A
AT26DF161
AT26DF161A
AT26DF321
AT26F004
I double-checked the data sheets and am confident this will work.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3756 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Tested fully on a ThinCan DBE61A
Signed-off-by: Mart Raudsepp <mart.raudsepp@artecdesign.ee>
Acked-by: Mart Raudsepp <mart.raudsepp@artecdesign.ee>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3755 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
The AT45 series SPI chips are DataFlash EEPROMs which means they have
odd (non-power-of-two) sector sizes, but some of the DataFlash chips can
be configured or ordered with power-of-two sector sizes.
Add probe support for the following Atmel SPI chips:
AT25DF021
AT25DF041A
AT25DF081
AT25DF161
AT25DF321A
AT25DF641
AT25F512B
AT25FS010
AT25FS040
AT26DF041
AT26DF081A
AT26DF161
AT26DF161A
AT26DF321
AT26F004
AT45CS1282
AT45DB011D
AT45DB021D
AT45DB041D
AT45DB081D
AT45DB161D
AT45DB321C
AT45DB321D
AT45DB642D
Add an explanation why the following chips can't be probed:
AT45BR3214B
AT45D011
AT45D021A
AT45D041A
AT45D081A
AT45D161
AT45DB011
AT45DB011B
AT45DB021A
AT45DB021B
AT45DB041A
AT45DB081A
AT45DB161
AT45DB161B
AT45DB321
AT45DB321B
AT45DB642
Add the ID, but no probing function for this chip:
AT25F512A
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Tested-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Acked-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3754 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Per report from Mario Rogen. Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3736 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
This helps a lot if we have to track down configuration weirdnesses.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3723 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
flashrom. Not all chips support all commands, so allow the implementer
to select the matching function.
Fix a layering violation in ICH SPI code to be less bad. Still not
perfect, but the new code is shorter, more generic and
architecturally
more sound.
TODO (in a separate patch):
- move the generic sector erase code to spi.c
- decide which erase command to use based on info about the chip
- create a generic spi_erase_all_sectors function which calls the
generic sector erase function
Thanks to Stefan for reviewing and commenting.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3722 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
Peter Stuge