The new config choice is called RUN_FSP_GOP. Some things had to happen
on the road:
* Drop confusing config GOP_SUPPORT,
* Add HAVE_FSP_GOP to chipsets that support it,
* Make running the GOP an option for FSP2.0 by returning 0
in random VBT getters.
Change-Id: I92f88424004a4c0abf1f39cc02e2a146bddbcedf
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19815
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Do not pass VBT table to fsp in normal mode and S3 resume so that
PEIM GFX will not get initialized.
Change-Id: Iab7be3cceb0f80ae0273940b36fdd9c41bdb121e
Signed-off-by: Abhay Kumar <abhay.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14575
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Move the FSP common code from the src/soc/intel/common directory into
the src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1 directory. Rename the Kconfig values
associated with this common code.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on kunimitsu
Change-Id: If1ca613b5010424c797e047c2258760ac3724a5a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e8228cb2a12df1cc06646071fafe10e50bf01440
Original-Change-Id: I4ea84ea4e3e96ae0cfdbbaeb1316caee83359293
Original-Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/306350
Original-Commit-Ready: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Original-Tested-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12156
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Latest FSPv83 made some change related to UPD/VPD
need this patch to align those
BUG=None
TEST=Build and Boot Cyan System
BRANCH=strago-7287.B
CQ-DEPEND=CL:*226897
Original-Change-Id: I6395f3a1f4eecaef14fc4720b00252f9e6143fa3
Original-Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/291394
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Original-Commit-Queue: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/303137
Original-Commit-Ready: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com>
Original-Tested-by: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com>
Change-Id: I9920eea84b802699454850bfde489668201ffeb6
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11813
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
FSP has some unique attributes which makes integration
cumbersome:
1. FSP header files do not include the types they need. Like
EDKII development it's expected types are provided by the
build system. Therefore, one needs to include the proper
files to avoid compilation issues.
2. An implementation of FSP for a chipset may use different
versions of the UEFI PI spec implementation. EDKII is a
proxy for all of UEFI specifications. In order to provide
flexibility one needs to binding a set of types and
structures from an UEFI PI implementation.
3. Each chipset FSP 1.1 implementation has a FspUpdVpd.h
file which defines it's own types. Commonality between
FSP chipset implementations are only named typedef
structs. The fields within are not consistent. And
because of FSP's insistence on typedefs it makes it
near impossible to forward declare structs.
The above 3 means one needs to include the correct UEFI
type bindings when working with FSP. The current
implementation had the SoC picking include paths in the
edk2 directory and using a bare <uefi_types.h> include.
Also, with the prior fsp_util.h implementation the SoC's
FSP FspUpdVpd.h header file was required since for providing
all the types at once (Generic FSP 1.1 and SoC types).
The binding has been changed in the following manner:
1. CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING option added which FSP 1.1
selects. No other bindings are currently available,
but this provides the policy.
2. Based on CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING the proper include
paths are added to the CPPFLAGS_common.
3. SoC Makefile.inc does not bind UEFI types nor does
it adjust CPPFLAGS_common in any way.
4. Provide a include/fsp directory under fsp1_1 and
expose src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1/include in the
include path. This split can allow a version 2,
for example, FSP to provide its own include files.
Yes, that means there needs to be consistency in
APIs, however that's not this patch.
5. Provide a way for code to differentiate the FSP spec
types (fsp/api.h) from the chipset FSP types
(fsp/soc_binding.h). This allows for code re-use that
doesn't need the chipset types to be defined such as
the FSP relocation code.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on glados.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I894165942cfe36936e186af5221efa810be8bb29
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11606
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Removing GOP initialization in normal mode since we don't need to
show splash screen in normal mode. GOP will get initialized in dev
and recovery mode.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Splash screen will come only in dev or recovery mode.
Change-Id: Ia5e12cf45d723f2f14c447e29b78119552d5e1ea
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 79d1c877343704ea51143b922d9ac9209be4d4b5
Original-Change-Id: Id5ca99757427206413483d07b4f422b4c0abfa5d
Original-Signed-off-by: Abhay <abhay.kumar@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/285300
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10990
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Provide a common romstage implementation for the Intel SOCs.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build for Braswell
Change-Id: I80f5f8f0f36e9023117b07d4af5c806fff8157b6
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10050
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
