247 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
247 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Project Ideas
|
|
|
|
This section collects ideas to improve coreboot and related projects and
|
|
should serve as a pool of ideas for people who want to enter the field
|
|
of firmware development but need some guidance what to work on.
|
|
|
|
These tasks can be adopted as part of programs like Google Summer of
|
|
Code or by motivated individuals outside such programs.
|
|
|
|
Each entry should outline what would be done, the benefit it brings
|
|
to the project, the pre-requisites, both in knowledge and parts. They
|
|
should also list people interested in supporting people who want to work
|
|
on them - since we started building this list for Google Summer of Code,
|
|
we'll adopt its term for those people and call them mentors.
|
|
|
|
The requirements for each project aim for productive work on the project,
|
|
but it's always possible to learn them "on the job". If you have any
|
|
doubt if you can bring yourself up to speed in a required time frame
|
|
(e.g. for GSoC), feel free to ask in the community or the mentors listed
|
|
with the projects. We can then try together to figure out if you're a
|
|
good match for a project, even when requirements might not all be met.
|
|
|
|
## Small projects
|
|
|
|
This is a collection of tasks which don't require deep knowledge on
|
|
coreboot itself. If you are a beginner and want to get familiar with the
|
|
the project and the code base, or if you just want to get your hands
|
|
dirty with some small tasks, then these are for you.
|
|
|
|
* Resolve static analysis issues reported by [scan-build] and
|
|
[Coverity scan]. More details on the page for
|
|
[Coverity scan integration].
|
|
|
|
* Resolve issues reported by the [linter][Linter issues]
|
|
|
|
[scan-build]: https://coreboot.org/scan-build/
|
|
[Coverity scan]: https://scan.coverity.com/projects/coreboot
|
|
[Coverity scan integration]: ../infrastructure/coverity.md
|
|
[Linter issues]: https://qa.coreboot.org/job/coreboot-untested-files/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/lint.txt
|
|
|
|
## Provide toolchain binaries
|
|
Our crossgcc subproject provides a uniform compiler environment for
|
|
working on coreboot and related projects. Sadly, building it takes hours,
|
|
which is a bad experience when trying to build coreboot the first time.
|
|
|
|
Provide packages/installers of our compiler toolchain for Linux distros,
|
|
Windows, Mac OS. For Windows, this should also include the environment
|
|
(shell, make, ...). A student doesn't have to cover _all_ platforms, but
|
|
pick a set of systems that match their interest and knowledge and lay
|
|
out a plan on how to do this.
|
|
|
|
The scripts to generate these packages should be usable on a Linux
|
|
host, as that's what we're using for our automated build testing system
|
|
that we could extend to provide current packages going forward. This
|
|
might include automating some virtualization system (eg. QEMU or CrosVM) for
|
|
non-Linux builds or Docker for different Linux distributions.
|
|
|
|
### Requirements
|
|
* coreboot knowledge: Should know how to build coreboot images and where
|
|
the compiler comes into play in our build system.
|
|
* other knowledge: Should know how packages or installers for their
|
|
target OS work. Knowledge of the GCC build system is a big plus
|
|
* hardware requirements: Nothing special
|
|
|
|
### Mentors
|
|
|
|
## Support Power9/Power8 in coreboot
|
|
There are some basic PPC64 stubs in coreboot, and there's open hardware
|
|
in TALOS2 and its family. While they already have fully open source
|
|
firmware, coreboot support adds a unified story for minimal firmware
|
|
across architectures.
|
|
|
|
### Requirements
|
|
* coreboot knowledge: Should be familiar with making chipset level
|
|
changes to the code.
|
|
* other knowledge: A general idea of the Power architecture, the more,
|
|
the better
|
|
* hardware requirements: QEMU Power bring-up exists, and even if it
|
|
probably needs to be fixed up, that shouldn't be an exceedingly large
|
|
task. For everything else, access to real Power8/9 hardware and recovery
|
|
tools (e.g. for external flashing) is required.
|
|
|
|
### Mentors
|
|
* Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
|
|
|
|
## Port payloads to ARM, AArch64 or RISC-V
|
|
While we have a rather big set of payloads for x86 based platforms, all other
|
|
architectures are rather limited. Improve the situation by porting a payload
|
|
to one of the platforms, for example GRUB2, U-Boot (the UI part), edk2,
|
|
FILO, or Linux-as-Payload.
|
|
|
|
Since this is a bit of a catch-all idea, an application to GSoC should pick a
|
|
combination of payload and architecture to support.
|
|
|
|
### Requirements
|
|
* coreboot knowledge: Should know the general boot flow in coreboot
|
|
* other knowledge: It helps to be familiar with the architecture you want to
|
|
work on.
|
|
* hardware requirements: Much of this can be done in QEMU or other emulators,
|
|
but the ability to test on real hardware is a plus.
|
|
|
|
### Mentors
|
|
* Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> for U-Boot payload projects
|
|
|
|
## Fully support building coreboot with the Clang compiler
|
|
Most coreboot code is written in C, and it would be useful to support
|
|
a second compiler suite in addition to gcc. Clang is another popular
|
|
compiler suite and the build system generally supports building coreboot
|
|
with it, but firmware is a rather special situation and we need to
|
|
adjust coreboot and Clang some more to get usable binaries out of that
|
|
combination.
|
|
|
|
The goal would be to get the emulation targets to boot reliably first,
|
|
but also to support real hardware. If you don't have hardware around,
|
|
you likely will find willing testers for devices they own and work from
|
|
their bug reports.
|
|
|
|
### Requirements
|
|
* coreboot knowledge: Have a general concept of the build system
|
|
* Clang knowledge: It may be necessary to apply minor modifications to Clang
|
|
itself, but at least there will be Clang-specific compiler options etc to
|
|
adapt, so some idea how compilers work and how to modify their behavior is
|
|
helpful.
|
|
* hardware requirements: If you have your own hardware that is already
|
|
supported by coreboot that can be a good test target, but you will debug
|
|
other people's hardware, too.
|
|
* debugging experience: It helps if you know how to get the most out of a bug
|
|
report, generate theories, build patches to test them and figure out what's
|
|
going on from the resulting logs.
|
|
|
|
### Mentors
|
|
|
|
## Extend Ghidra to support analysis of firmware images
|
|
[Ghidra](https://ghidra-sre.org) is a recently released cross-platform
|
|
disassembler and decompiler that is extensible through plugins. Make it
|
|
useful for firmware related work: Automatically parse formats (eg. by
|
|
integrating UEFITool, cbfstool, decompressors), automatically identify
|
|
16/32/64bit code on x86/amd64, etc.
|
|
|
|
This has been done in 2019 with [some neat
|
|
features](https://github.com/al3xtjames/ghidra-firmware-utils) being
|
|
developed, but it may be possible to expand support for all kinds of firmware
|
|
analyses.
|
|
|
|
## Learn hardware behavior from I/O and memory access logs
|
|
[SerialICE](https://www.serialice.com) is a tool to trace the behavior of
|
|
executable code like firmware images. One result of that is a long log file
|
|
containing the accesses to hardware resources.
|
|
|
|
It would be useful to have a tool that assists a developer-analyst in deriving
|
|
knowledge about hardware from such logs. This likely can't be entirely
|
|
automatic, but a tool that finds patterns and can propagate them across the
|
|
log (incrementially raising the log from plain I/O accesses to a high-level
|
|
description of driver behavior) would be of great use.
|
|
|
|
This is a research-heavy project.
|
|
|
|
### Requirements
|
|
* Driver knowledge: Somebody working on this should be familiar with
|
|
how hardware works (eg. MMIO based register access, index/data port
|
|
accesses) and how to read data sheets.
|
|
* Machine Learning: ML techniques may be useful to find structure in traces.
|
|
|
|
### Mentors
|
|
* Ron Minnich <rminnich@google.com>
|
|
|
|
## Libpayload based memtest payload
|
|
[Memtest86+](https://www.memtest.org/) has some limitations: first and
|
|
foremost it only works on x86, while it can print to serial console the
|
|
GUI only works in legacy VGA mode.
|
|
|
|
This project would involve porting the memtest suite to libpayload and
|
|
build a payload around it.
|
|
|
|
### Requirements
|
|
* coreboot knowledge: Should know how to build coreboot images and
|
|
include payloads.
|
|
* other knowledge: Knowledge on how dram works is a plus.
|
|
* hardware requirements: Initial work can happen on qemu targets,
|
|
being able to test on coreboot supported hardware is a plus.
|
|
|
|
### Mentors
|
|
* TODO
|
|
|
|
## Fix POST code handling
|
|
coreboot supports writing POST codes to I/O port 80.
|
|
There are various Kconfigs that deal with POST codes, which don't have
|
|
effect on most platforms.
|
|
The code to send POST codes is scattered in C and Assembly, some use
|
|
functions, some use macros and others simply use the `outb` instruction.
|
|
The POST codes are duplicated between stages and aren't documented properly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tasks:
|
|
* Guard Kconfigs with a *depends on* to only show on supported platforms
|
|
* Remove duplicated Kconfigs
|
|
* Replace `outb(0x80, ...)` with calls to `post_code(...)`
|
|
* Update Documentation/POSTCODES
|
|
* Use defines from console/post_codes.h where possible
|
|
* Drop duplicated POST codes
|
|
* Make use of all possible 255 values
|
|
|
|
### Requirements
|
|
* knowledge in the coreboot build system and the concept of stages
|
|
* other knowledge: Little experience with C and x86 Assembly
|
|
* hardware requirements: Nothing special
|
|
|
|
### Mentors
|
|
* Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
|
|
* Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
|
|
|
|
## Board status replacement
|
|
The [Board status page](https://coreboot.org/status/board-status.html) allows
|
|
to see last working commit of a board. The page is generated by a cron job
|
|
that runs on a huge git repository.
|
|
|
|
Build an open source replacement written in Golang using existing tools
|
|
and libraries, consisting of a backend, a frontend and client side
|
|
scripts. The backend should connect to an SQL database with can be
|
|
controlled using a RESTful API. The RESTful API should have basic authentication
|
|
for management tasks and new board status uploads.
|
|
|
|
At least one older test result should be kept in the database.
|
|
|
|
The frontend should use established UI libraries or frameworks (for example
|
|
Angular) to display the current board status, that is if it's working or not
|
|
and some details provided with the last test. If a board isn't working the last
|
|
working commit (if any) should be shown in addition to the broken one.
|
|
|
|
Provide a script/tool that allows to:
|
|
1. Push mainboard details from coreboot master CI
|
|
2. Push mainboard test results from authenticated users containing
|
|
* working
|
|
* commit hash
|
|
* bootlog (if any)
|
|
* dmesg (if it's booting)
|
|
* timestamps (if it's booting)
|
|
* coreboot config
|
|
|
|
### Requirements
|
|
* coreboot knowledge: Non-technical, needed to perform requirements analysis
|
|
* software knowledge: Golang, SQL for the backend, JS for the frontend
|
|
|
|
### Mentors
|
|
* Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
|
|
* Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
|