We were running this loop 100 times with 5 ms delays. Change it
to run 500 times with 1 ms delays, which gives us the same
overall timeout but lets us bail out a bit sooner -- in practice,
at most, 4 ms sooner but every bit counts. Note, however, that
the tighter timing does reduce opportunities for threading. There
is a non-obvious set of tradeoffs on timeouts.
Change-Id: I4af671c2a791aa92e446e66ac2fe5710d1e6aa4c
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167387
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 575e910127dc74416018f182ef27ef223e61daef)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6543
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
cff6667eba