The ChromeOS machines employing vboot verfication require
different combinations of support:
1. When vboot verification starts.
2. Is the vboot code a separate stage or program?
3. If a separate stage, does the that vboot program (verstage) return
to the stage that loaded the verstage?
For the above, #1 is dependent on when to load/run vboot logic which
is orthogonal to #2. However, #3 is dependent on #2. The logic
to act on the combinations follows in subsequent patches.
Change-Id: I39ef7a7c2858e7de43aa99c38121e85a57f1f2f6
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10024
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
This change switches all SOC vendors and southbridges
to be autoincluded by Makefile.inc, rather than having to be
mentioned explicitly in soc/Makefile.inc or in
soc/<vendor>/Makefile.inc.
This means, vendor and SOC directories are now "drop
in", e.g. be placed in the coreboot directory hierarchy
without having to modify any higher level coreboot files.
The long term plan is to enable out of tree components to be
built with a given coreboot version (given that the API did not
change).
Change-Id: Iede26fe184b09c53cec23a545d04953701cbc41d
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9799
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
- Remove Kconfig files that are no longer used:
src/vencorcode/Kconfig
src/soc/marvell/Kconfig
- Fix the drivers/sil/Kconfig to point to drivers/sil/3114 which had
the same code.
- Make sure all Kconfig files have linefeeds at the end. This can cause
problems, although it wasn't in this case.
- Include cpu/intel/model_65x/Kconfig which was not being included.
Change-Id: Ia57a1e0433e302fa9be557525dc966cae57059c9
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9998
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
There's no need to have the VBOOT2_VERIFY_FIRMWARE
distinction because it's the only game in town.
Change-Id: I82aab665934c27829e1a04115bf499ae527a91aa
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9958
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
If verified boot is enabled, merge verstage into bootblock. This also
requires custom bootblock code to actually call into verstage.
[pg: modified to match upstream]
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32631
BRANCH=ToT
TEST=booted on cosmos development board.
Change-Id: I53251aac966ee15da24232c23fefa636de8b253b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 2b8ada263017b46afa755b5acb759574184dba06
Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Change-Id: Ia0e1236357aa32bf553fb8cc98f3a8d29de17f45
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229795
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10008
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
BOARD_ID functionality is not what requires the GPIO lib,
but it is the mainboard specific implementations that do.
The option essentially says whether the SoC provides
<soc/gpio.h> (with the interface required by the common
GPIO code). Right now, x86 and Samsung's Exynos SOCs
don't have support for this interface.
So this should be selected by the SOC, not by
BOARD_ID_SUPPORT.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
BUG=none
BRANCH=none
TEST=emerge-storm coreboot still successfully compiled an image
Change-Id: I0ce2bd7ce023f22791d31a6245833b61135504b3
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 0dd4dea521372194eedf11b077d95fd3b15ad9f7
Original-Change-Id: I3dea6c2fb42a23fcb9d384c3bbfa7fc8e217be2d
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/262743
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9899
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Turns out there are uses for memlayout regions not specific to vboot2.
Rather than add yet another set of headers for a single region, let's
make the vboot2 one common for chromeos.
BRANCH=veyron
BUG=chrome-os-partner:35705
TEST=Booted Jerry, compiled Blaze, Cosmos, Ryu and Storm.
Change-Id: I228e0ffce1ccc792e7f5f5be6facaaca2650d818
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: c6d7aab9f4e6d0cfa12aa0478288e54ec3096d9b
Original-Change-Id: I1dd7d9c4b6ab24de695d42a38913b6d9b952d49b
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/242630
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9748
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
this change defines a custom romstage entry for bg4cd. the entry code
stalls subcores, sets up the stack, and clears the bss before jumping to main.
BUG=none
BRANCH=tot
TEST=built all current boards. booted cosmos p1
Change-Id: Idde43f94555bec7804a16928c58ce673956a39e5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 7a35e12eb29b351cc0baaea24344f00d2ba905f6
Original-Change-Id: I9172e873a43847f3ea82cd1d9fd0841f0db83994
Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/238022
Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9722
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS
master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually
put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any
checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun
to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment
changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of
your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf
binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those
issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image
layout a completely automated part of cbfstool.
Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer
hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86
solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the
CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures.
This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in
ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the
CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be
changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM).
Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name)
argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid
use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the
device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already
interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco.
Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c
Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
This patch aligns bg4cd to the new SoC header include scheme.
Also alphabetized headers in affected files since we touch them anyway.
BUG=None
TEST=Tested with whole series. Compiled Cosmos.
Change-Id: I32a4407f7deb2b1752b6220a140352724f320637
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 0b6bb6990417863010258632374c3f5ac19350c9
Original-Change-Id: Ia5299659ad186f2e7d698adfa7562396e747473f
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/224506
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9358
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
The SOC code should include the SPI controller driver when configured.
Enable SPI support for cosmos.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32631
TEST=cosmos builds
Change-Id: I8212f191b7d80f0bee86f746813edaf8e5ee6db1
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: fd4853be5157247bb73fc22b9d4f8300228fe6ce
Original-Change-Id: If7e12e2fb04e63c36d9696d13e08397b91a77a8c
Original-Commit-Id: 7b1d095e5df6a864d3564bbf7a20cc211f75629a
Original-Change-Id: If9dd80cb96120d34a0865f7882cd62e45fed749d
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223750
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223752
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9356
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
This file provides the SOC specific SPI driver API, it needs to be
filled up with code. Function descriptions can be found in
src/include/spi-generic.h.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32631
TEST=compiles with the upcoming patches applied.
Change-Id: I3546d5f9fb2971f4ccb7a57ce8164fd77686af72
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 0583f17fe3f6a258321765b91eae608e33577afe
Original-Change-Id: I0ee04ca17874a13403007bba80d5e8a7708bc625
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223719
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9355
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
