Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stefan Reinauer 77b1655d9b vboot2: add verstage
This reverts the revert commit 5780d6f387
and fixes the build issue that cuased it to be reverted.

Verstage will host vboot2 for firmware verification.
It's a stage in the sense that it has its own set of toolchains,
compiler flags,
and includes. This allows us to easily add object files as needed. But
it's directly linked to bootblock. This allows us to avoid code
duplication for stage loading and jumping (e.g. cbfs driver) for the
boards
where bootblock has to run in a different architecture (e.g. Tegra124).
To avoid name space conflict, verstage symbols are prefixed with
verstage_.

TEST=Built with VBOOT2_VERIFY_FIRMWARE on/off. Booted Nyan Blaze.
BUG=None
BRANCH=none

Original-Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org>
Original-Change-Id: Iad57741157ec70426c676e46c5855e6797ac1dac
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/204376
Original-Reviewed-by: Randall Spangler <rspangler@chromium.org>

(cherry picked from commit 27940f891678dae975b68f2fc729ad7348192af3)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: I2a83b87c29d98d97ae316091cf3ed7b024e21daf
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8224
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-01-27 01:41:40 +01:00
Vadim Bendebury 0b341b341d ipq/arm: Redesign hooks for bootblock
The following patches had to be squashed
to properly build all the different ARM boards.

ipq8064: storm: re-arrange bootblock initialization

The recent addition of the storm bootblock initialization broke
compilation of Exynos platforms. The SOC specific code needs to be
kept in the respective source files, not in the common CPU code.

As of now coreboot does not provide a separate SOC initialization API.
In general it makes sense to invoke SOC initialization from the board
initialization code, as the board knows what SOC it is running on.

Presently all what's need initialization on 8064 is the timer. This
patch adds the SOC initialization framework for 8064 and moves there
the related code.

BUG=chrome-os-partner:27784
TEST=manual
  . nyan_big, peach_pit, and storm targets build fine now.

Original-Change-Id: Iae9a021f8cbf7d009770b02d798147a3e08420e8
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197835
(cherry picked from commit 3ea7307b531b1a78c692e4f71a0d81b32108ebf0)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>

arm: Redesign mainboard and SoC hooks for bootblock

This patch makes some slight changes to the way bootblock_cpu_init() and
bootblock_mainboard_init() are used on ARM. Experience has shown that
nearly every board needs either one or both of these hooks, so having
explicit Kconfigs for them has become unwieldy. Instead, this patch
implements them as a weak symbol that can be overridden by mainboard/SoC
code, as the more recent arm64_soc_init() is also doing.

Since the whole concept of a single "CPU" on ARM systems has kinda died
out, rename bootblock_cpu_init() to bootblock_soc_init(). (This had
already been done on Storm/ipq806x, which is now adjusted to directly
use the generic hook.) Also add a proper license header to
bootblock_common.h that was somehow missing.

Leaving non-ARM32 architectures out for now, since they are still using
the really old and weird x86 model of directly including a file. These
architectures should also eventually be aligned with the cleaner ARM32
model as they mature.

BRANCH=None
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32123
TEST=Booted on Pinky. Compiled for Storm and confirmed in the
disassembly that bootblock_soc_init() is still compiled in and called
right before the (now no-op) bootblock_mainboard_init().

Original-Change-Id: I57013b99c3af455cc3d7e78f344888d27ffb8d79
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/231940
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 257aaee9e3aeeffe50ed54de7342dd2bc9baae76)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>

Change-Id: Id055fe60a8caf63a9787138811dc69ac04dfba57
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7879
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-12-30 20:05:04 +01:00
Edward O'Callaghan 569bd3ff60 cpu/armltd/cortex-a9: Remove stub func dead code
Change-Id: Ia8246e2bdf346883072a924d8808f14f48d44bb3
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7351
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2014-12-19 22:32:13 +01:00
Furquan Shaikh 99ac98f7e1 Introduce stage-specific architecture for coreboot
Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the
architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for
each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of
architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different
architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas
romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage
specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain
and compiler flags for every stage.

These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in
different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid
of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any
architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are
identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or
ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules
can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all
special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined
using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile.

In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY
and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others.
Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the
toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler.

Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at
various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of
the stage being compiled.

We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER
as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are
associated with each of the stages.

Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2014-05-06 20:23:31 +02:00
Furquan Shaikh fd33781fbf Move ARCH_* from board/Kconfig to cpu or soc Kconfig.
CONFIG_ARCH is a property of the cpu or soc rather than a property of the
board. Hence, move ARCH_* from every single board to respective cpu or soc
Kconfigs. Also update abuild to ignore ARCH_ from mainboards.

Change-Id: I6ec1206de5a20601c32d001a384a47f46e6ce479
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5570
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2014-05-03 00:25:20 +02:00
Kyösti Mälkki 48713a1bf7 console: Drop EARLY_CONSOLE option
We have means to easily disable a specific console in romstage if
necessary, so this global option makes little sense.

The option was initially introduced as a work-around for build issues
around CACHE_AS_RAM, ROMCC and ARCH_ARMV7 dependencies for UARTs.

Change-Id: I797bdd11a48ddd813d3ee7ccef9a0c050f16f669
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2014-04-30 07:00:20 +02:00
Stefan Reinauer 9531692ee1 qemu-armv7 CPU: Move Kconfig code into CPU directory
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>

Change-Id: Icae8042add5f4dd5c707369ffc4587c613d69d29
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/59324
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4315
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-12-05 00:38:06 +01:00
Stefan Reinauer 08dc357146 ARMv7: De-uboot-ify Exynos5250 code
When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code
was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded
code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports.

There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the
5250's Kconfig file.

Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10 20:08:15 +02:00
David Hendricks 1fb11d105b armv7/exynos5250: Deprecate sdelay in favor of udelay
This gets rid of the clock-tick based sdelay in favor of udelay().
udelay() is more consistent and easier to work with, and this allows
us to carry one less variation of timers (and headers and sources...).

Every 1 unit in the sdelay() argument was assumed to cause a delay of
2 clock ticks (@1.7GHz). So the conversion factor is roughly:
sdelay(N) = udelay(((N * 2) / 1.7 * 10^9) * 10^6)
          = udelay((N * 2) / (1.7 * 10^3))

The sdelay() periods used were:
sdelay(100) --> udelay(1)
sdelay(0x10000) --> udelay(78) (rounded up to udelay(100))

There was one instance of sdelay(10000), which looked like sort of a
typo since sdelay(0x10000) was used elsewhere. sdelay(10000) should
approximate to about 12us, so we'll stick with that for now and leave
a note.

Change-Id: I5e7407865ceafa701eea1d613bbe50cf4734f33e
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3079
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-17 23:06:40 +02:00
Ronald G. Minnich 601b27596f ARMV7: minor tweaks to inter-stage calling and payload handling.
Payloads, by design, can return. There's lots of mechanism in the payload code
to support it, and the chooser payload relies on it. Hence, we should not mark
the function call in exit_stage as noreturn.

Not all ARM have unified caches, and it's not always easy to tell what
to do. So we are very paranoid. Before we call between stages, we
should carefully flush the dcache to memory and invalidate the icache.
This may be more than is necessary on all architectures but it
doesn't really hurt for the most part.

So compile cache management code into all stages, and call the
flush dcache/invalidate icache from all stages.

Change-Id: Ib9cc625c4dfd2d7d4b3c69a74686cc655a9d6484
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2462
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-02-20 20:49:16 +01:00
Hung-Te Lin 7635a60ca8 armv7: Add emulation/qemu-armv7 board.
To simplify testing ARM implementation, we need a QEMU configuration for
ARM. The qemu-armv7 provides serial output, CBFS simulation, and full
boot path (bootblock, romstage, ramstage) to verify the boot loader
functionality.

To run with QEMU:
 export QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none
 qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -m 1024M -nographic -kernel build/coreboot.rom

Verified to boot until ramstage loaded successfully by QEMU v1.0.50.

Change-Id: I1f23ffaf408199811a0756236821c7e0f2a85004
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2354
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-02-12 03:02:45 +01:00