There's a `GPL-2.0-or-later` version of this file in volteer2, so use it
in place of these weirdly-licensed files.
Change-Id: Icde2f6539d9c726d6967350f74e7bc015e01e7b5
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43855
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Put them in common code just in case something depends on the values.
Change-Id: Ief526efcbd5ba5546572da1bc6bb6d86729f4e54
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43851
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
There are many places where we do this. Put it inside an inline function
for convenience reasons.
Change-Id: I5515a52458b6c78c1a723cb08e6471eb9bac9cd6
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43871
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This applies what commit 79572e4f32 does
to the devicetree settings of the zork devices.
Change-Id: Ife94818d771f137e56c51ad1598148f60fcf5345
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43820
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Since FSP pre-populates the UPD struct with the non-zero default values,
coreboot shouldn't set them to zero in the case that they aren't
configured in the board's devicetree. Since all parameters being zero is
a valid case, this patch adds another devicetree option that applying
the devicetree settings for the USB2 PHY tuning depends on being set.
BUG=b:161923068
Change-Id: I66e5811ce64298b0644d2881420634a8ce1379d7
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43781
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I49e9cef1dfaa62dcfbd1260cec459ff5910ad5da
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43202
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell, and avoids
unlikely but potential bugs regarding missing braces in macros.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Ic341fe70e7d6fb4751f2fefbdedbee5c90dd8d1f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43201
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I90632909cd7d632d80739b3762e4ccba51624b75
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43200
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Iaf557caac16b36e356a4fb1b05416718d86093bf
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43199
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Iaa6d5d72cd0368342205a9b98552c1e0762abbce
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43198
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I9d9edd774143b0a98773b6d5de630d116cb6f0b1
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43197
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I08ccbc70744a17d589450e321a3ed77d9a56492f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43196
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I98d17fc470149b181e8d92b8bcc5d99c68299212
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43195
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: If75b4299918f5bee3cc68bc662d03f1a819aef68
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43194
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
According to the documentation [1], RX Level/Edge Configuration (trig)
and GPIO Tx/Rx Buffer Disable (bufdis) [2] settings are not applicable
in native mode and BIOS does not need to configure them. Therefore,
there is no need to configure this in gpio.h using PAD_CFG_NF_BUF_TRIG
macros. Use PAD_CFG_NF instead and set this fields to 0.
[1] Intel document #549921
[2] Intel document #336067-007US
This is part of the patch set
"src/mb/*, src/soc/intel/common/gpio: Remove PAD_CFG_NF_BUF_TRIG ":
CB:43455 - cedarisland: undo set trig and bufdis for NF pads
CB:43454 - tiogapass: undo set trig and bufdis for NF pads
CB:43561 - h110m: undo set trig and bufdis for NF pads
CB:43569 - soc/intel/common/gpio_defs: Remove PAD_CFG_NF_BUF_TRIG
Change-Id: Ie3ee2eadc08826d49e8517c83ab6831398e3aa93
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43455
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Reviewed-by: Lance Zhao
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
There's no reason to return the result of a void function.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I677dec1622768874a51effd6d73f0b2329f27aed
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43193
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell, and
prevents possible bugs when using these macros.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I18e9a750901f1bf8d3b61f4b64bbed907bc1fa15
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43192
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Ifd71881e3924dca3add1e788852e7eb078405d00
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43191
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I52d58c6b77cd870b5d3f5892521e4c82027c4cac
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43190
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I0b07f8d52203c0a6d20b747f36d4d22cf53c791c
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43189
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I34079985e165ce8d10c7a2b4f0dde15060132208
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43188
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Ia21b588a3ce07e33a7a8d36e1464c0ff5e456c3e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43187
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This to silent a bug found using gcc-10.
src/northbridge/intel/ironlake/raminit.c: In function 'setup_heci_uma':
src/northbridge/intel/ironlake/raminit.c:1805:11: error: 'reply.command' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
1805 | if (reply.command != (MKHI_SET_UMA | (1 << 7)))
| ~~~~~^~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Change-Id: I0d13de549b6d428ac3675ee3f91eb5e42aeb25e8
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42461
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Add missing registers and sort them by ascending offsets.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 does not change.
Change-Id: I98f836668144032d920b56afff878acc0a58ed82
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43691
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Both files are identical, so we only need one copy in the tree.
Change-Id: I07d7429caca7f6211a186b770c3608f642d4f269
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43159
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Set power limits in devicetree for Tiger Lake Y-SKU based volteer
variant boards.
BUG=b:152639350
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and tested power limits on volteer variant board.
Change-Id: If4f1226473b48365e5962df9fff29910c99007fc
Signed-off-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43607
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caveh Jalali <caveh@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This patch updates Tiger Lake SA DID and report platform. According to
doc #613584, remove PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TGL_ID_U_1 and add below
definitions of SA ID for TGL-UP4 skus:
TGL-UP4(Y) (4+2): PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TGL_ID_Y_4_2 0x9A12h
TGL-UP4(Y) (2+2): PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TGL_ID_Y_2_2 0x9A02h
Change-Id: Id9d9c9ac3bf39582b0da610e6ef912031939c763
Signed-off-by: Derek Huang <derek.huang@intel.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43061
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caveh Jalali <caveh@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Since the binary layout of this struct matters, it should be marked as
packed. Since all struct elements are uint8_t, this shouldn't result in
a different layout though.
BUG=b:161923068
Change-Id: I6a390c3a3f35eaf8a72928b4cef0e9f405770619
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43780
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
- remove comments (except the GPIO group), because it does not contain
useful information that helps to understand the circuit, which we do
not have;
- remove empty lines between macros;
- use a shorter PAD_CFG_GPI_INT() macro instead of
PAD_CFG_GPI_TRIG_OWN() to set DRIVER mode.
Change-Id: Ia7111341aab6f400da70d936849e4d4c9406905b
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43409
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Converts bit field macros to target PAD_CFG_*() macros, which were
hidden in the comments. To do this, the following command was used:
./intelp2m -n -t 1 -p snr -file ../../src/mainboard/supermicro/
x11-lga1151-series/variants/x11ssm-f/include/variant/gpio.h
./intelp2m -n -t 1 -p snr -file ../../src/mainboard/supermicro/
x11-lga1151-series/variants/x11ssh-tf/include/variant/gpio.h
This is part of the patch set
"mb/supermicro/x11-lga1151: Rewrite pad config using intelp2m":
CB:42916 - 1/4 Decode raw register values
CB:42917 - 2/4 Exclude fields for PAD_CFG
CB:42918 - 3/4 Fixes some field macro
CB:35679 - 4/4 Convert field macros to PAD_CFG
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Supermicro X11SSH-TF and X11SSM-F,
remains identical.
Change-Id: Idad7536854d4b1ae7dcf7934e81de438478fe059
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35679
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Elyes HAOUAS