This code is not even being build-tested. Drop it before it grows moss.
Change-Id: I4772680875b20308e57da073bbcdc4597aeed893
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43215
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This code is not even being build-tested. Drop it before it grows moss.
Change-Id: Icd6b3226814f48c4cdd2c2f879c66cb6847a14e9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43216
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This code is not even being build-tested. Drop it before it grows moss.
Change-Id: I0296cb4265c5b68ee9e11b140763b7d50d1da7ea
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43218
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This code is not even being build-tested. Drop it before it grows moss.
Change-Id: I2fff78231d6dfbed56bb885aa23d5cd2a745325e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43217
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The kernel requires the display oprom is loaded and ran
in order for the kernel to not panic. Therefore, select the
correct settings such that normal mode works for Chrome OS.
BUG=b:160560510
TEST=Boot Trembyle in developer mode and normal mode
Change-Id: Ia6bcc99f8880a45818f959a957660c2c43b1bfdf
Signed-off-by: Rob Barnes <robbarnes@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43257
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Information taken from the boardviews. We are not configuring any GPIO
in bootblock, but we may want to do so in the future.
Change-Id: Iac16f02490adcccd9486718847ca2b1a47f4e6cf
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42404
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The old values were completely out of whack. Use the same settings as
vendor firmware. The SUPERIO_NUVOTON_NCT6776_COM_A option overwrites
configured settings, so drop it from Kconfig to prevent conflicts.
Change-Id: I9743741518adc153d594ccae65298c7dcc8a88d1
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42403
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
This simplifies things and makes type checking possible.
Change-Id: Iefc9baabae286aac2f2c46853adf1f6edf01586f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43103
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
It is no longer used anywhere. Drop it before it rots.
Change-Id: I4bc3d5bd898058e575144a3c6c3fccb78dcff2e2
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43099
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Instead of passing around a pointer to an array, just write the relevant
registers directly. Note that intel/baskingridge used spaces to indent
line continuations and had to be replaced with tabs to quell Jenkins.
Change-Id: Ifa06a2ab24da9b8c6aac6480542fa32d04f6d6fe
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43097
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
The common fast SPI driver has a function to set up the SPI OPCODE menu.
Use this function here instead of coding it again as it results in the
very same register values being written.
TEST=Compare register values in both cases and make sure they match.
Change-Id: I98457a0b0652f746734ee4204e10acd09b6e5fda
Signed-off-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43166
Reviewed-by: Mario Scheithauer <mario.scheithauer@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: <uwe.poeche@siemens.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
The resulting binary changes, but it shouldn't matter.
Change-Id: Ic930ab7eee265e86a7cc1095021e3744885f2c25
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43184
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
This can result in accesses outside array bounds. Copy what Braswell
does, which is slightly safer.
Change-Id: If3d6f4e1f8921f0be7f4e5e438b7e73c46b8ef95
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43183
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Idfdb1e6ec9bd0c1a11ef36ce0434ed5e12895187
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43186
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I3d4c1285bdc4b061383b7bb6262f69671166b9c4
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43185
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Change-Id: I60e4db72eed17cdeebd30b010f351e1ffc4187e3
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43182
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
The PCI COMMAND register is 16 bits wide, so do not use 32-bit ops.
Change-Id: I1baba632bda4a50d5279ca3659047d1dd1e8da34
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43181
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
This patch improves the image resampling (scaling) code in CBGFX to use
the Lanczos algorithm that is widely considered the "best" resampling
algorithm (e.g. also the first choice in Python's PIL library). It is of
course much more elaborate and therefore slower than bilinear
resampling, but a lot of the difference can be made up with
optimizations, and the resulting code was found to still produce
acceptable speeds for existing Chrome OS UI use cases (on an Arm
Cortex-A55 device, time to scale an image to 1101x593 went from ~88ms to
~275ms, a little over 3x slowdown). Nevertheless, if this should be too
slow for anyone there's also an option to tune it down a little, but
still much better than bilinear (same operation was ~170ms with this).
Example images (scaled up by a factor of 7):
Old (bilinear): https://i.imgur.com/ytr2n4Z.png
New (Lanczos a=3): https://i.imgur.com/f0vKluM.png
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Idde6f61865bfac2801ee4fff40ac64e4ebddff1a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42792
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
struct fraction is slooooooooooow. This patch adds a simple 64-bit
(32-bits integral, 32-bits fractional) fixed-point math API that is
*much* faster (observed roughly 5x speed-up) when doing intensive
graphics operations. It is optimized for speed over accuracy so some
operations may lose a bit more precision than expected, but overall it's
still plenty of bits for most use cases.
Also includes support for basic trigonometric functions with a small
lookup table.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Id0f9c23980e36ce0ac0b7c5cd0bc66153bca1fd0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42993
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Remove I2C4 since it is a slave device used for USB-C mux control
and should not be included with the other master devices.
BUG=b:160624619 b:160292546
TEST=EC can communicate with AP mux I2C4 slave
Change-Id: Idaad618e90d6264d881dc66628cf581a856c231d
Signed-off-by: Edward Hill <ecgh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43263
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
If CONFIG_CMOS_POST is enabled, psp_verstage breaks because the
spinlock code is missing. Add dummy spinlock code as the spinlocks
aren't needed in the PSP.
TEST=Build with CONFIG_CMOS_POST enabled.
BUG=None
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: Iea6f31e500e1b26f0b974c6eaa486209b9c81459
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43310
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This change drops the selection of VARIANT_SUPPORTS_PRE_V3_SCHEMATICS
for Vilboz since it did not have any build with pre-v3 schematics.
Change-Id: I3919ad43e1dae95a4fa71073e83865e92f30dfec
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43225
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This change adds following two helper functions:
1. variant_uses_v3_schematics() - Check whether the variant is using
v3 version of schematics.
2. variant_has_active_low_wifi_power() - Check whether the variant is
using active low power enable for WiFi.
In addition to this, Kconfig options are reorganized to add two new
configs - VARIANT_SUPPORTS_PRE_V3_SCHEMATICS and
VARIANT_SUPPORTS_WIFI_POWER_ACTIVE_HIGH. This allows the helper
functions to return `true` early without checking for board version.
Eventually, when a variant decides to drop support for pre-v3
schematics, it can be dropped from selecting
VARIANT_SUPPORTS_PRE_V3_SCHEMATICS. Similarly, when the variant
decides to drop support for active high power enable for WiFi, it can
be dropped from selecting VARIANT_SUPPORTS_WIFI_POWER_ACTIVE_HIGH.
Change-Id: I62851299e8dd7929a8e1e9a287389abd71c7706c
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43224
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This change moves the configuration of GPIO_137 to happen in ramstage
since there is nothing in coreboot that requires the state of write
protect GPIO for zork.
Change-Id: Ibaf8e7d9dd5d13a9b39b10ac0174de345b8380f5
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43223
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This change removes "write protect" entry from the list of GPIOs
shared with depthcharge as done for other Chrome OS boards in CB:39318.
Change-Id: Ibd39e8d6835e465b2ab5eebcc245e45db5d84deb
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43222
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This results in a wake from S5 as well. Since the PS/2 keyboard now
works, this behavior is annoying and, therefore, undesired.
Change-Id: I180f17c87df23f2a1bbd5c968c64a4b2bc7d9978
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42431
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This allows the CPU fan tach signal to reach the Super I/O.
Change-Id: Ibf73d7c7c1951b75ee4e0c731caf951f2c6bfcae
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42402
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Otherwise, there are complaints about it from the allocator.
Change-Id: Ibf6124c3720959154d0b9649871f9bf68a912f14
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42401
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
GPIO2 is not used as such, GPIO7 is though. Also relocate GPIO1 settings
under the correct PnP device. Confirmed findings against boardviews.
Change-Id: I4a88ac82d640ca709e7875b4d34b9babb1f2e0a4
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42400
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
No wonder why the PS/2 keyboard was being detected as a mouse!
Change-Id: I7080c8210d96b079a5c08d98554ed154141086a6
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42398
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Only one generic decode range is needed for the HWM.
Change-Id: I964a073efbfaa1d79d3483d59ad04fe674bcb275
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42131
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Perform the same operations as the RCBA reg script did, but directly
writing the corresponding registers. Some of these operations could be
simplified, but it is not done on this commit to ease verification.
Change-Id: I4c3177ab14ca9bfa2e8d11c27fb249850183eee5
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43098
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Comments stating that this was mainboard-specific were very wrong.
Change-Id: I7026ca9c7dabd01b4a0c0549b697e006d5f75eb8
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43096
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Why use a Rube Goldberg machine to write and then read one register?
Change-Id: I282c12f162b5ae69c40729903c09ae81a14c9761
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43095
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Other platforms do this as well. It will ease refactoring on follow-ups.
Change-Id: I643982a58c6f5370c78acef93740f27df001a06d
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43093
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
The "normalized" boot mode is only used in a single place, so there's no
need to use a variable. Also, reword the associated comment, which seems
to be unnecessarily vague: the hardcoded assumptions are inside the MRC.
Change-Id: I260d10f231f5de765d2675416d7047717d391d8f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43092
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
There's no need to repeat the same values over four variants.
Change-Id: Ifc4a9961fe9c87f15a6039e6e478682fab5b0bb7
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43039
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Files are identical for all southbridges, except bd82x6x. We will take
care of that in subsequent commits.
Change-Id: I38e5d440e188d26f8997bc22a956187b728487ca
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43157
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Files are identical between all three southbridges, and differ for PCH.
Change-Id: Ic6a926af675bda3db3a5795df9e8f490caf3ebf4
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43156
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between ACPI for these three southbridges.
Change-Id: If49bad776ebc98cab439f8ea6942471520c476a3
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43155
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
It does nothing special, so why have it in the first place?
Change-Id: I27aff0ed67e9c69ab78050d35b49f6e26924d31a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43174
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This was silently commenting out the line after it.
Change-Id: I2714090b8f99193ace420ad02e2d42b324349c9e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43169
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Angel Pons
