For pq module size registers such as DISP_AAL_SIZE, the high bits
should be HSIZE, while low bits should be VSIZE. Fix the incorrect
settings for these registers where width and height are reversed.
According to MediaTek, there is no practical impact on mt8183 devices,
but it's still nice to get this fixed to avoid future confusion.
BUG=b:171167210
TEST=none
BRANCH=kukui
Change-Id: I4b6aedf9a3ca133fcbe9cb88b99a13d228233e24
Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46626
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
TSEG is located below TOLUD. The size is configured in ESMRAMC but can
also be configured with "-global mch.extended-tseg-mbytes=5" command
line argument. Note that the size in ESMRAMC needs to be 'invalid' (3)
for this to take action.
coreboot will leave TSEG at the default 1MiB.
Note that even if TSEG does not end up being used, it is likely a good
idea to not put anything there as if SMM gets locked down by something
else it will suddenly be inaccessible.
Change-Id: I5fd82a42d6602f1369bb3c69556c46f537542705
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48236
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Broadwell code unconditionally enables timed MWAIT, but not all Haswell
steppings support it. In preparation for merging Haswell and Broadwell,
also enable timed MWAIT on Haswell code, but only if it is supported.
Change-Id: I1d11d62f1801d65ae4d5623994fd55fd35e8f34a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46916
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The old code was broken and register 0x90 didn't even exist any more in
the config space of the SMBus PCI device, so just always return the MMIO
base address of the SMBus controller. As far as I've seen, no board in
tree uses this functionality at the moment.
Change-Id: Ib80d5c928da6022427afb8ccc969fb2aac953c2d
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reported-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49121
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
There seems to be a bug[1] in the GNU linker for the RISC-V architecture
triggered by symbols that are more than 2GB offset from the program
counter. My next patch is introducing symbols like that and stuck on
this problem. The code path that runs into the issue is only taken when
passing the --emit-relocs flag, which is really only needed for building
rmodules. Since RISC-V platforms don't use any rmodules at the moment,
let's disable the flag on RISC-V until the issue can be fixed in the
toolchain.
[1]: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27180
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I784a506034325c0ba937589416acaafbf80080e2
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49449
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to a bootblock gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Change-Id: Iad40b6315a29e7aea612a3e1a169372d296d1d6c
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49443
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I357099f797be178543a9e6637335cd0a68633071
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49441
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I8b30eb5d70c34ae3e2ed24ab52dd1357a54c5ae7
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49439
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I0b956427a9cec56d06b03f7f05138f75137b4ea3
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49437
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ibc727302109456eb1d86652c947ce85b3a64c5b2
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49436
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I80369ab70d5510cb4f388f3029119e7148361af4
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49435
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to a early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Id6b55d7f3d3fbfc5b55497708f24006614760d03
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49434
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I130fd26944169430a84c3609432b1b5283581c99
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49432
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ie3878b47b8e20c51b928a38df9ccedf2d50d478e
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49431
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ib19a4f64eaf25bf2eb47ee60748a68538fc0729a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49430
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I279956f30cbb6fb031cdfe6aaa09b644b6b7d3e7
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49427
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The LPC/eSPI pad configuration is already done at board-level. Thus,
drop redundant configuration by dropping the call to lpc_configure_pads.
Change-Id: Ib9e62bf19e6f1fbe32a340e4802c13504a0d6def
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49417
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: Ie1e53e72c65fdcfe4be2e01134873aa7858c28ff
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49416
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms.
This is done by adding one missing pad to the early gpio table and
dropping the call to the soc function.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: I210633d4520fcfab59f68268bd7991557433ce38
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49415
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: If0693a4419c58dde3c4536698940f03c30304b9d
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49414
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms.
This is done by adding missing pads to the bootblock gpio table.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: I95993b1bd4f1fd8b4ac7b21fb89ec4d196b0240a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49412
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I62ffbe36bd7b7675aa0f41a8c6e9214d04ad4ae5
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49428
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I6fedcebea3bb31d992bac1e3b21382fea93a8b82
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49429
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ieeb738afd54e77ee853ee109009f611411aa0d4a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49426
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I5482f44b361925b7d2dbcbf1065c1be035c68b0b
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49424
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do early pad configuration in early bootblock before console init, to
make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any
other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence
behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I7dcf88d61c305f0598a0a79f8cfa46ef5009564b
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49419
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: Ie33bae481f430a1c4410a0a4e2b2a34a3e78adaa
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49411
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The `mobile` suffix is misleading, since desktop CPUs share the same
CPUIDs. Remove unused stepping IDs and add the full CPUIDs instead.
Finally, add Broadwell CPUIDs in preparation for merging CPU code.
Note that steppings for Haswell in various comments are incorrect.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 remains identical.
Change-Id: I19e56b8826b1514550ae95e6363b0df2d08e3cb7
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46915
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Backport Broadwell's s0ix support to Haswell in preparation to unify
both platforms' CPU code. Note that only ULT variants support s0ix.
This option is currently unused, but will be put to use in subsequent
commits, when switching Broadwell mainboards to use Haswell's CPU code.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 remains identical.
Change-Id: I91c6f937c09c9254a6f698f3a6fb6366364e3b2b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46924
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The `clear` command for SMMSTORE version 1 does not require a parameter.
Change-Id: I992b7ce5962bf7ee62b7e1970ae7aa1b975ef42e
Signed-off-by: Tim Crawford <tcrawford@system76.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49724
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Soller <jeremy@system76.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Allow MRC training in SA GV.
BUG=b:177779469
BRANCH=firmware-volteer-13672.B
TEST=Built and booted into OS.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Chang <kevin.chang@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: Idc9f634135b489450f53f8cd28d80649309d0f70
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49636
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Assigned USB2 port to type-c use.
BUG=b:177483060
BRANCH=firmware-volteer-13672.B
TEST=Built and booted into OS.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Chang <kevin.chang@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: I9bd820406124927d56296508be05033217c0d472
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49638
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
On FSP1.1 platform cbmem_initiailze() is called in
chipset_teardown_car_main(). This causes double
call op cbmem_initialize().
Add call to cbmem_online() to avoid double CBMEM init.
BUG = N/A
TEST = Build and boot on Facebook FBG1701
Change-Id: I449ddfc94f1099d7c0e9005e6a5cf509e1433bb1
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49646
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
prog_locate() will load FSP, before CBMEM is initialized.
The vboot workbuffer is used for loading, but
CBMEM_ID_VBOOT_WORKBUF is not available.
A NULL pointer is returned as workbuffer resulting in error
'Ramstage was not loaded!' at second boot.
Initialize CBMEM before calling prog_locate().
BUG = N/A
TEST = Build and boot on Facebook FBG1701
Change-Id: I2f04a326a95840937b71f6ad65a7c011268ec6d6
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49639
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
[ 84s] /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/10/../../../../i586-suse-linux/bin/ld: msrutils.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `PresentTypes'; msrtool.o:(.bss+0x14): first defined here
[ 84s] /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/10/../../../../i586-suse-linux/bin/ld: msrutils.o:(.bss+0x4): multiple definition of `MsrTypes'; msrtool.o:(.bss+0x18): first defined here
There should be typedefs, not variable definitions.
Change-Id: I663a011e9f1fc169126570d5eac7abe82d204a90
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49648
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
For the time being every soc/intel selects ACPI_SOC_NVS
and pwrs is a required field for the common initialisation
implementation of followup work.
Change-Id: I4a0c7eb35f0646898e49fad15c6448607c398731
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49493
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
0 is converted to not used, so use a special value to allow using PCIe
root port #1.
Change-Id: I2d64afc9bb4627913492edad8f36566e7fb18166
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Soller <jeremy@system76.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Crawford <tcrawford@system76.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49172
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
This change updates pcie_rp.h to reflow the comment blocks to fit
within 80 columns to match the original style of the file. This
addresses comment received on
CB:49370 (https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49370/comment/0f3fe10d_4e218b5f/).
Change-Id: I565ad602e0e3a2ee09e8345479d82e2ce0a31fd0
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49725
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Increase DCACHE_RAM_SIZE to 32kB and remove "NO_CBFS_MCACHE".
It’s quite safe to increase DCACHE_RAM_SIZE. All LGA775 targets
should have at least 256K L2 cache. That is plenty for XIP RO cache of
bootblock + romstage and a 32K CAR.
Change-Id: I393b2727bd90a990c3108a4dbead62b17d7fc531
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49505
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Correct GPIO settings as below reason:
1. GPP_G7 not being used but set to NF.
2. GPP_C22 and GPP_C23 is set to NC but internal pull down to 20K
BUG=b:177283756
BRANCH=dedede
TEST=emerge-dedede coreboot chromeos-bootimage and boot into emmc
Change-Id: Idf25674efa2336bde98c5abaff278484fd71ea8b
Signed-off-by: Stanley Wu <stanley1.wu@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49348
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Henry Sun <henrysun@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Correct GPIO settings as below reason:
1. GPP_D19/GPP_D20/GPP_D21 not being used but set to NF.
2. GPP_B7 should configure as WWAN SAR detect ODL, but set to NC
BUG=b:175932166
BRANCH=dedede
TEST=emerge-dedede coreboot chromeos-bootimage and boot into emmc
Signed-off-by: Stanley Wu <stanley1.wu@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: Id7780d5332551ed3fd20ef14f8b5d31164f16385
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49645
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Yu-Ping Wu