Put them in common code just in case something depends on the values.
Change-Id: Ief526efcbd5ba5546572da1bc6bb6d86729f4e54
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43851
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
There are many places where we do this. Put it inside an inline function
for convenience reasons.
Change-Id: I5515a52458b6c78c1a723cb08e6471eb9bac9cd6
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43871
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This applies what commit 79572e4f32 does
to the devicetree settings of the zork devices.
Change-Id: Ife94818d771f137e56c51ad1598148f60fcf5345
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43820
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Since FSP pre-populates the UPD struct with the non-zero default values,
coreboot shouldn't set them to zero in the case that they aren't
configured in the board's devicetree. Since all parameters being zero is
a valid case, this patch adds another devicetree option that applying
the devicetree settings for the USB2 PHY tuning depends on being set.
BUG=b:161923068
Change-Id: I66e5811ce64298b0644d2881420634a8ce1379d7
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43781
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I49e9cef1dfaa62dcfbd1260cec459ff5910ad5da
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43202
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell, and avoids
unlikely but potential bugs regarding missing braces in macros.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Ic341fe70e7d6fb4751f2fefbdedbee5c90dd8d1f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43201
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I90632909cd7d632d80739b3762e4ccba51624b75
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43200
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Iaf557caac16b36e356a4fb1b05416718d86093bf
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43199
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Iaa6d5d72cd0368342205a9b98552c1e0762abbce
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43198
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I9d9edd774143b0a98773b6d5de630d116cb6f0b1
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43197
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I08ccbc70744a17d589450e321a3ed77d9a56492f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43196
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I98d17fc470149b181e8d92b8bcc5d99c68299212
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43195
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: If75b4299918f5bee3cc68bc662d03f1a819aef68
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43194
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
According to the documentation [1], RX Level/Edge Configuration (trig)
and GPIO Tx/Rx Buffer Disable (bufdis) [2] settings are not applicable
in native mode and BIOS does not need to configure them. Therefore,
there is no need to configure this in gpio.h using PAD_CFG_NF_BUF_TRIG
macros. Use PAD_CFG_NF instead and set this fields to 0.
[1] Intel document #549921
[2] Intel document #336067-007US
This is part of the patch set
"src/mb/*, src/soc/intel/common/gpio: Remove PAD_CFG_NF_BUF_TRIG ":
CB:43455 - cedarisland: undo set trig and bufdis for NF pads
CB:43454 - tiogapass: undo set trig and bufdis for NF pads
CB:43561 - h110m: undo set trig and bufdis for NF pads
CB:43569 - soc/intel/common/gpio_defs: Remove PAD_CFG_NF_BUF_TRIG
Change-Id: Ie3ee2eadc08826d49e8517c83ab6831398e3aa93
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43455
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Reviewed-by: Lance Zhao
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
There's no reason to return the result of a void function.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I677dec1622768874a51effd6d73f0b2329f27aed
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43193
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell, and
prevents possible bugs when using these macros.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I18e9a750901f1bf8d3b61f4b64bbed907bc1fa15
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43192
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Ifd71881e3924dca3add1e788852e7eb078405d00
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43191
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I52d58c6b77cd870b5d3f5892521e4c82027c4cac
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43190
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I0b07f8d52203c0a6d20b747f36d4d22cf53c791c
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43189
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: I34079985e165ce8d10c7a2b4f0dde15060132208
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43188
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This reduces the differences between Bay Trail and Braswell.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Google Ninja remains identical.
Change-Id: Ia21b588a3ce07e33a7a8d36e1464c0ff5e456c3e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43187
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This to silent a bug found using gcc-10.
src/northbridge/intel/ironlake/raminit.c: In function 'setup_heci_uma':
src/northbridge/intel/ironlake/raminit.c:1805:11: error: 'reply.command' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
1805 | if (reply.command != (MKHI_SET_UMA | (1 << 7)))
| ~~~~~^~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Change-Id: I0d13de549b6d428ac3675ee3f91eb5e42aeb25e8
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42461
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Add missing registers and sort them by ascending offsets.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 does not change.
Change-Id: I98f836668144032d920b56afff878acc0a58ed82
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43691
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Both files are identical, so we only need one copy in the tree.
Change-Id: I07d7429caca7f6211a186b770c3608f642d4f269
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43159
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Set power limits in devicetree for Tiger Lake Y-SKU based volteer
variant boards.
BUG=b:152639350
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and tested power limits on volteer variant board.
Change-Id: If4f1226473b48365e5962df9fff29910c99007fc
Signed-off-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43607
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caveh Jalali <caveh@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This patch updates Tiger Lake SA DID and report platform. According to
doc #613584, remove PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TGL_ID_U_1 and add below
definitions of SA ID for TGL-UP4 skus:
TGL-UP4(Y) (4+2): PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TGL_ID_Y_4_2 0x9A12h
TGL-UP4(Y) (2+2): PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_TGL_ID_Y_2_2 0x9A02h
Change-Id: Id9d9c9ac3bf39582b0da610e6ef912031939c763
Signed-off-by: Derek Huang <derek.huang@intel.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43061
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caveh Jalali <caveh@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Since the binary layout of this struct matters, it should be marked as
packed. Since all struct elements are uint8_t, this shouldn't result in
a different layout though.
BUG=b:161923068
Change-Id: I6a390c3a3f35eaf8a72928b4cef0e9f405770619
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43780
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
- remove comments (except the GPIO group), because it does not contain
useful information that helps to understand the circuit, which we do
not have;
- remove empty lines between macros;
- use a shorter PAD_CFG_GPI_INT() macro instead of
PAD_CFG_GPI_TRIG_OWN() to set DRIVER mode.
Change-Id: Ia7111341aab6f400da70d936849e4d4c9406905b
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43409
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Converts bit field macros to target PAD_CFG_*() macros, which were
hidden in the comments. To do this, the following command was used:
./intelp2m -n -t 1 -p snr -file ../../src/mainboard/supermicro/
x11-lga1151-series/variants/x11ssm-f/include/variant/gpio.h
./intelp2m -n -t 1 -p snr -file ../../src/mainboard/supermicro/
x11-lga1151-series/variants/x11ssh-tf/include/variant/gpio.h
This is part of the patch set
"mb/supermicro/x11-lga1151: Rewrite pad config using intelp2m":
CB:42916 - 1/4 Decode raw register values
CB:42917 - 2/4 Exclude fields for PAD_CFG
CB:42918 - 3/4 Fixes some field macro
CB:35679 - 4/4 Convert field macros to PAD_CFG
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Supermicro X11SSH-TF and X11SSM-F,
remains identical.
Change-Id: Idad7536854d4b1ae7dcf7934e81de438478fe059
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35679
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Fixes some bit fields to convert to target macros PAD_CFG_*() macros.
This is part of the patch set
"mb/supermicro/x11-lga1151: Rewrite pad config using intelp2m":
CB:42916 - 1/4 Decode raw register values
CB:42917 - 2/4 Exclude fields for PAD_CFG
CB:42918 - 3/4 Fixes some field macro
CB:35679 - 4/4 Convert field macros to PAD_CFG
Change-Id: I291f5f0f34505c466b610aa4049c8cc35937d140
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42918
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This patch excludes bit fields that should be ignored [1] in order
to convert current macros to target PAD_CFG_*() macros. The following
commands were used for this:
./intelp2m -ii -fld cb -ign -t 1 -p snr -file ../../src/mainboard/
supermicro/x11-lga1151-series/variants/x11ssm-f/include/variant/gpio.h
/intelp2m -ii -fld cb -ign -t 1 -p snr -file ../../src/mainboard/
supermicro/x11-lga1151-series/variants/x11ssh-tf/include/variant/gpio.h
[1] ignore RX Level/Edge Configuration (bit 26:25) and RX/TX Buffer
Disable (bit 9:8) for the native function, because it does not
affect the pad in this mode.
This is part of the patch set
"mb/supermicro/x11-lga1151: Rewrite pad config using intelp2m":
CB:42916 - 1/4 Decode raw register values
CB:42917 - 2/4 Exclude fields for PAD_CFG
CB:42918 - 3/4 Fixes some field macro
CB:35679 - 4/4 Convert field macros to PAD_CFG
Change-Id: Icdf366a8d416598cec5afcb9a0fae6bf7ecd7ba0
Signed-off-by: Maxim Polyakov <max.senia.poliak@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42917
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
In the middle of the Great DPTF Refactor of 2020, new volteer variants
were added, but their dptf.asl files are no longer used, so delete them.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I52f2042aa870a29026eb9fe122340ad07654e706
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43828
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caveh Jalali <caveh@chromium.org>
Since we are not using raw ASL files anymore for DPTF, delete the
template file too, so that it does not keep getting added for new
board variants.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ia128989c64b8c02759c326431b4ee30fd2b483e4
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43829
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Caveh Jalali <caveh@chromium.org>
When refactoring, one can move code around quite a bit while preserving
reproducibility, unless there is an assert-style macro somewhere... As
these macros use __FILE__ and __LINE__, just moving them is enough to
change the resulting binary, making timeless builds rather useless.
To improve reproducibility, do not use __FILE__ nor __LINE__ inside the
assert-style macros. Instead, use hardcoded values. Plus, mention that
timeless builds lack such information in place of the file name, so that
grepping for the printed string directs one towards this commit. And for
the immutable line number, we can use 404: line number not found :-)
Change-Id: Id42d7121b6864759c042f8e4e438ee77a8ac0b41
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42196
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Angel Pons