Add camera ACPI configuration for Voema
BUG=b:169551066
TEST=Build and boot Voema. Start camera app and able to
capture images.
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david_wu@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: I903e5e0b5f85718c7c9cbb6d5cafb8fc9ad5814e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49302
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jim Lai <jim.lai@intel.com>
Set the supported C-State to C1 and C6. This matches the states in
CPUID(5).
Change-Id: If32b8256097b5b2bee7fb074fab105e4b54d14b3
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marcjones@sysproconsulting.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49803
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Zhang <jonzhang@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do not pass ACPI S3 state as a parameter, by locally
calling acpi_is_wakeup_s3() compiler has better chance
for optimizing HAVE_ACPI_RESUME=n case.
Test for acpi_s3_allowed() is already included in the
implementation of acpi_is_wakeup_s3() and is removed
as redunandant.
For ramstage, acpi_is_wakeup_s3() evaluates to
romstage_handoff_if_resume().
Change-Id: I6c1e00ec3d5be9a47b9d911c73965bc0c2b17624
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49838
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
For board version 6 afterward, it will have external pull-up for
GPP_C12, and remove internal pull-up.
BUG=b:177618684
TEST=emerge-dedede coreboot, check evtest if SW_PEN_INSERTED event
(value:1/0) when insert/eject pen, and eject pen to wake system from s0ix
Signed-off-by: Wisley Chen <wisley.chen@quantatw.com>
Change-Id: I503873afb48384168dcd8a822c7246655898356e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49469
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Henry Sun <henrysun@google.com>
set pwron_varybl_to_blon to 0x5, which means fw will delay 20ms between backlight
on and vary backlight.
BUG=b:171269338
BRANCH=zork
TEST=Build; Verify the UPD was passed to system integrated table; measure
the power on sequence on dalboz
Signed-off-by: Chris Wang <chris.wang@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: I8af35eee7777a8e71b42f0c128795290b8c2c93e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48865
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
"usb2_ports[7]" for internal bluetooth device was configured as
'USB2_PORT_EMPTY' mistakenly in previous patch, so we need to enable
it again.
BUG=None
BRANCH=firmware-dedede-13606.B
TEST=Built and verified BT device existence with lsusb
Change-Id: Id2900152e23bbc2f454d064dc86a9e45e934ea0f
Signed-off-by: Seunghwan Kim <sh_.kim@samsung.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49788
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This patch adds explicit initializations for the remaining named display
(power) control GPIOs to the bootblock GPIO init code. These pins are
usually mapped to pins that are already configured to pull-downs on
power-on reset so this wasn't really required, but we have already moved
them around so often that you never know when EEs might one day move
them to a pin with a different power-on reset configuration, so it's
better to be explicit.
In one particular case, GPIO(67) (used by CoachZ rev1+ but not by
anything else for the EN_PP3300_DX_EDP pin) is not actually a pull-down
on boot, even though that is claimed by the datasheet. This is likely
due to the fact that it can serve as the SPI_HOLD pin for the boot flash
QSPI bus, so even though our board's boot flash doesn't really use that
pin, it seems that the boot ROM still configures it as such.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I533baa962d2dfc87cfa510f442ed2e8912e0e5b0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49810
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: mturney mturney <mturney@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
This conflicts with the MSTH i2c_tunnel.
BUG=b:175146875
BRANCH=zork
TEST=Boot trembyle and inspect ACPI tables.
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Iac04c7dc361d427f5ebb99644aa70bd0c7dbb918
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49812
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
It's easier to understand what these symbolic names mean rather than
using the constants; the static.c will will end up (indirectly)
including `soc/usb.h` therefore the macros are in scope here.
Change-Id: I5ef977a05a2522e177f32c99bfab74f9288ae869
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49488
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nick Chen <nick_xr_chen@wistron.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
From AMD USB phy specialist recommended that for DB port2 (type-A), port3 (type-C C1)
the most effective corrections for the depressed eye are
tx_rise_tune=0x0
tx_pre_emp_amp_tune=0x3
tx_fsls_tune = 0x3
BUG=b:173476380
BRANCH=zork
TEST=1. emerge-zork coreboot
2. pass USB 2.0 SI eye diagram verification
Change-Id: Ib31c5d55e30b958d3e552e8d0b4a160947444636
Signed-off-by: Kevin Chiu <kevin.chiu@quantatw.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49826
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
From AMD USB phy specialist recommended that for DB port2 (type-A), port3 (type-C C1)
the most effective corrections for the depressed eye are:
tx_rise_tune=0x0
tx_pre_emp_amp_tune=0x3
tx_fsls_tune = 0x3
BUG=b:165209698
BRANCH=zork
TEST=1. emerge-zork coreboot
2. pass USB 2.0 SI eye diagram verification
Change-Id: I80afd6bf1257b9a72d0d7651b48d243ebaf5de2f
Signed-off-by: Kevin Chiu <kevin.chiu@quantatw.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49824
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Barnes <robbarnes@google.com>
The only difference is an additional include that is no longer needed.
Change-Id: I0053d03aa4d05f5c0fa833d8634419b6667e38a7
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49832
Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
There's no need to repeat the same code on every board.
Change-Id: I2e19decfe8609fa644e609673a56ee5109bafefa
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49831
Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This change uses the newly added meminit block driver and updates TGL
SoC and mainboard code accordingly.
TEST=Verified that UPDs are configured correctly with and without this
change.
Change-Id: I6d58cd6568b7bbe03c4e3011b2301209893e85a9
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49042
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
All Broadwell boards only use the `mainboard_pre_raminit` function to
call `mainboard_fill_pei_data` and optionally `mainboard_fill_spd_data`.
Move the declaration and weak definition of `mainboard_fill_spd_data` to
platform code, replace the call to `mainboard_pre_raminit` in romstage.c
with calls to `mainboard_fill_pei_data` and `mainboard_fill_spd_data`,
and delete all other instances of `mainboard_pre_raminit` for Broadwell.
Finally, delete now-empty romstage.c and spd.h files from mainboards.
Change-Id: I3334b20bd7138bb753b996a137ff106e87c6e8a5
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49776
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Make it optional and change its signature.
Change-Id: I4b5f3fb08e8954514ebf39e72c95aa62d66856d7
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49775
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
This allows us to drop many now-redundant Kconfig options.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Purism Librem 13 v1 remains identical.
The default configuration file also remains identical, as expected.
Change-Id: I20b0200550508679bf2533342ce918b221dcf81e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46953
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
The VR config and S0ix options are now specified for the CPU chip.
Change-Id: I75e405d41b4a0605e786fe761c92535e62d0cfce
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46945
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The code to read the SPD file and index it is not variant-specific.
Change-Id: Iaee0a77934a45c65bf32dd0dba23cec654abc0b9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49773
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
It is identical for all variants that have it.
Change-Id: Iec3a5f036d9b760d1075059f2db1480b1c76273e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49772
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
They are part of the same line, so merge them.
Change-Id: I969ce91f7a5f16a85750c140eaa444d7923b2014
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49771
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Factor out common DRAM SPD definitions and relocate SPD GPIO macros.
Also factor out common function definition. Drop now-empty headers.
Change-Id: Id05ba6c9cea27fbad5ee831f033d0de43717847e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49770
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ib827e9b2919dbd0e16f30b8dfde46348365d9622
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49438
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
The PMC doesn't response any more due to invalid CNVi GPIO
configuration. This caused a 30 second boot delay in FSP-S.
Use the same values as FSP-S does. Always disable external I2S BT
audio and use NF3 for pad GPP_D5 and GPP_D6.
Tested on Prodrive hermes:
No boot delay can be observed any more.
Change-Id: I6f4a954786ec21512b0dce908d333952e96de048
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49678
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
TSEG is located below TOLUD. The size is configured in ESMRAMC but can
also be configured with "-global mch.extended-tseg-mbytes=5" command
line argument. Note that the size in ESMRAMC needs to be 'invalid' (3)
for this to take action.
coreboot will leave TSEG at the default 1MiB.
Note that even if TSEG does not end up being used, it is likely a good
idea to not put anything there as if SMM gets locked down by something
else it will suddenly be inaccessible.
Change-Id: I5fd82a42d6602f1369bb3c69556c46f537542705
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48236
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to a bootblock gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Change-Id: Iad40b6315a29e7aea612a3e1a169372d296d1d6c
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49443
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I357099f797be178543a9e6637335cd0a68633071
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49441
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I8b30eb5d70c34ae3e2ed24ab52dd1357a54c5ae7
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49439
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I0b956427a9cec56d06b03f7f05138f75137b4ea3
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49437
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ibc727302109456eb1d86652c947ce85b3a64c5b2
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49436
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I80369ab70d5510cb4f388f3029119e7148361af4
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49435
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to a early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Id6b55d7f3d3fbfc5b55497708f24006614760d03
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49434
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I130fd26944169430a84c3609432b1b5283581c99
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49432
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ie3878b47b8e20c51b928a38df9ccedf2d50d478e
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49431
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ib19a4f64eaf25bf2eb47ee60748a68538fc0729a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49430
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I279956f30cbb6fb031cdfe6aaa09b644b6b7d3e7
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49427
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The LPC/eSPI pad configuration is already done at board-level. Thus,
drop redundant configuration by dropping the call to lpc_configure_pads.
Change-Id: Ib9e62bf19e6f1fbe32a340e4802c13504a0d6def
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49417
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: Ie1e53e72c65fdcfe4be2e01134873aa7858c28ff
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49416
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms.
This is done by adding one missing pad to the early gpio table and
dropping the call to the soc function.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: I210633d4520fcfab59f68268bd7991557433ce38
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49415
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: If0693a4419c58dde3c4536698940f03c30304b9d
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49414
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms.
This is done by adding missing pads to the bootblock gpio table.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: I95993b1bd4f1fd8b4ac7b21fb89ec4d196b0240a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49412
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I62ffbe36bd7b7675aa0f41a8c6e9214d04ad4ae5
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49428
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I6fedcebea3bb31d992bac1e3b21382fea93a8b82
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49429
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ieeb738afd54e77ee853ee109009f611411aa0d4a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49426
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I5482f44b361925b7d2dbcbf1065c1be035c68b0b
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49424
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do early pad configuration in early bootblock before console init, to
make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any
other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence
behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I7dcf88d61c305f0598a0a79f8cfa46ef5009564b
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49419
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: Ie33bae481f430a1c4410a0a4e2b2a34a3e78adaa
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49411
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
