Make it optional and change its signature.
Change-Id: I4b5f3fb08e8954514ebf39e72c95aa62d66856d7
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49775
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Broadwell boards now use the CPU code for Haswell. Therefore, these
devicetree options are no longer used anywhere and can be removed.
Change-Id: Ib0d1b6eecc11a70d1a2614669353a8040c860535
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46995
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
This allows us to drop many now-redundant Kconfig options.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Purism Librem 13 v1 remains identical.
The default configuration file also remains identical, as expected.
Change-Id: I20b0200550508679bf2533342ce918b221dcf81e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46953
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
All boards now use Haswell's CPU code, which also supports Broadwell.
Change-Id: Ia0b8f7bf64334dd965baad0a30a7bb0ed81c4cac
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46950
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Now that the boards use Haswell's CPU code, Broadwell can be updated.
Change-Id: If07e5272f07edb59bb18eef1f80d7d5807b26e66
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46949
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The VR config and S0ix options are now specified for the CPU chip.
Change-Id: I75e405d41b4a0605e786fe761c92535e62d0cfce
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46945
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This allows individual boards to be adapted to use Haswell CPU code.
Also rename the CPU_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS symbol to avoid any collisions.
Change-Id: I65e878dacf0a0d53fd8d4defce6684f4ceb92588
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46944
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This allows the correct Haswell and Lynxpoint code to be used.
Change-Id: Icbfc5bb11b1ea755a143fa340a3971376f4e5e91
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46958
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Broadwell can now use the Haswell CPU driver.
Change-Id: I36138cab72b1e3ad0ff7f6434996f5ce00de9d0d
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46942
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Backport commit 55228ba4b4 (broadwell: Changes from 2.2.0 ref code) to
Haswell, to eventually migrate Broadwell to use the same Haswell code.
Change-Id: I03d9ff16bcaab9091bd723ce933aa3f2d71e29b9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46921
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The Picasso VBIOS is not setting the reserved_mask_size correctly. This
change relaxes the constraint to allow bpp_mask <= bits_per_pixel. This
is how the code previously used to work before CB:39002.
BUG=b:177094598, b:177422379
TEST=boot zork and see depthcharge working
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I2e67532fa949fbd673269d8d7f1c0d8af6124ac9
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49404
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Create uniform logging for the (unlikely) case of a CBMEM
entry disappearing.
Change-Id: I7c5414a03d869423c8ae5192a990fde5f9582f2d
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49817
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
To implement some common helpers for CBMEM_ID_POWER_STATE
allocation use the same struct name as soc/intel.
Change-Id: I5d2c06a2a7b4602374562197c99b0ad7bcf50afb
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49835
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
We currently have a mixture of calls used to determine
global ACPI S3 state. Reduce the boilerplate, ultimately
acpi_wakeup_is_s3() should be the only to keep.
Change-Id: Iff950d2bcf7eacbbdd40865abf62c35a2e8c3c69
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/47694
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
It is never allowed for ELOG to modify the state.
Change-Id: Ie24df3969a3744f27b23997471666e2490e24b84
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49820
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
There is no reason to duplicate the table.
BUG=b:170595019
BRANCH=zork
TEST=boot zork with pci=nomsi and verify /proc/interrupts didn't change
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ief714266cdb1b4f89afd0d9e50238200b87687ef
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49367
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
I think it makes the code a bit cleaner.
BUG=b:170595019
BRANCH=zork
TEST=boot zork with pci=nomsi and verify /proc/interrupts didn't change
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ib5e8e5b690d9612e8ae257f5d15c25122e1c91e6
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49842
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Each bridge can only have one device.
BUG=b:170595019
BRANCH=zork
TEST=none
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I7e476221dfcabc841cc1ed4bc4b1175c0652dcfe
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49841
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
The dummy AOAC parent device was nice because it grouped all the AOAC
devices. Unfortunately windows doesn't like this dummy device and causes
"Not Found" errors. This change moves the AOAC devices to the actual
devices that use them.
BUG=b:175146875
TEST=Boot linux and make sure power resources are enabled/disabled.
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Idd4a94baa4358ee4f15c461a5bb54ca925023a13
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49814
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
The code to read the SPD file and index it is not variant-specific.
Change-Id: Iaee0a77934a45c65bf32dd0dba23cec654abc0b9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49773
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
It is identical for all variants that have it.
Change-Id: Iec3a5f036d9b760d1075059f2db1480b1c76273e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49772
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
They are part of the same line, so merge them.
Change-Id: I969ce91f7a5f16a85750c140eaa444d7923b2014
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49771
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Factor out common DRAM SPD definitions and relocate SPD GPIO macros.
Also factor out common function definition. Drop now-empty headers.
Change-Id: Id05ba6c9cea27fbad5ee831f033d0de43717847e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49770
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ib827e9b2919dbd0e16f30b8dfde46348365d9622
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49438
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Drop LPC pad configuration code since all boards now do pad
configuration on their own. The comment about LPC_CLKRUNB when using
eSPI is moved to `Documentation/getting_started/gpio.md`.
Change-Id: I710d6aee8c3b2c8282cd321cd0688b9b26abea07
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49410
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Add the "ERROR:" tag so that it ease debug effect.
TEST=Test tools like "suspend_stress_test" (specific to Chrome OS) can
identify the obvious coreboot ERROR prior running S3 resume test.
Change-Id: I64717ce0412d43697f42ea2122b932037d28dd48
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49798
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
CSE Firmware Sync is being performed in romstage currently. But the CSE
board reset is not included as part of romstage. This causes the CSE
firmware sync to use global reset instead of EC assisted AP reset with
the old Cr50 Firmware version. Include the board specific CSE reset in
romstage.
BUG=b:171731175,b:177795247
BRANCH=dedede,volteer,puff
TEST=Ensured that the Drawlat boots to OS with both old(0.0.22) and
new(0.6.7) Cr50 FW versions.
Change-Id: I5e362271ffb68ffd5884279acd1ab0a462195a8a
Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49850
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Kernel needs to access EC RFWU entry in order to retrieve from EC about
port and mux info and set EC operations like modes change. This change
provides EC RFWU path and update for Retimer driver usage.
BUG=b:162528867
TEST=Booted to kernel and verified EC RFWU path from ACPI SSDT table.
Signed-off-by: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com>
Change-Id: I3817d93cfdeedf15825dab6c537b151fd063338b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49257
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The RFWU byte is defined as Bits[3:0] for port number and Bits[7:4] for
operations. The supported operations are:
RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_PORT_INFO 0
RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_PD_SUSPEND 1
RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_PD_RESUME 2
RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_GET_MUX 3
RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_SET_USB 4
RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_SET_SAFE 5
RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_SET_TBT 6
RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_DISCONNECT 7
BUG=b:162528867
TEST=Booted to kernel and verified RFWU entry from ACPI DSDT ERAM field.
Signed-off-by: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com>
Change-Id: I1ba04c6357b6fd0cc33ffce33e7e430539bace79
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49051
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
In order to update the BB retimers for usb4/tbt they need to be turned
on and into TBT mode. Expand the current DSM to allow for the use of an
EC RAM byte RFWU to get the current state of each port and whether or
not it has a retimer. It also allows Kernel to issue state transitions
for the retimer to be put into TBT mode for firmware update.
BUG=b:162528867
TEST=Along with work in progress kernel and EC patches, the Retimer
firmware update is verified under device attached and no device attached
scenarios.
Change-Id: I768cfb56790049c231173b0ea0f8e08fe6b64b93
Signed-off-by: Brandon Breitenstein <brandon.breitenstein@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48630
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
The PMC doesn't response any more due to invalid CNVi GPIO
configuration. This caused a 30 second boot delay in FSP-S.
Use the same values as FSP-S does. Always disable external I2S BT
audio and use NF3 for pad GPP_D5 and GPP_D6.
Tested on Prodrive hermes:
No boot delay can be observed any more.
Change-Id: I6f4a954786ec21512b0dce908d333952e96de048
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49678
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
This change adds a helper macro `BITS_PER_BYTE` so that it doesn't
have to be defined in multiple places.
Change-Id: Idc344047a5660791eaeb1ce8012910c11f6010ba
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49736
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Some efuse settings would not be applied automatically, so we need
set the settings manually. The low power consumption would not be
optimal without correct efuse settings.
BUG=b:172636735
BRANCH=none
TEST=see 'pmic_efuse_setting: Set efuses in 11 msecs'
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
Change-Id: Ideb862c3cb0f1fee183804aed74fcf141bf1f5df
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49006
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
For pq module size registers such as DISP_AAL_SIZE, the high bits
should be HSIZE, while low bits should be VSIZE. Fix the incorrect
settings for these registers where width and height are reversed.
According to MediaTek, there is no practical impact on mt8183 devices,
but it's still nice to get this fixed to avoid future confusion.
BUG=b:171167210
TEST=none
BRANCH=kukui
Change-Id: I4b6aedf9a3ca133fcbe9cb88b99a13d228233e24
Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46626
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
TSEG is located below TOLUD. The size is configured in ESMRAMC but can
also be configured with "-global mch.extended-tseg-mbytes=5" command
line argument. Note that the size in ESMRAMC needs to be 'invalid' (3)
for this to take action.
coreboot will leave TSEG at the default 1MiB.
Note that even if TSEG does not end up being used, it is likely a good
idea to not put anything there as if SMM gets locked down by something
else it will suddenly be inaccessible.
Change-Id: I5fd82a42d6602f1369bb3c69556c46f537542705
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48236
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Broadwell code unconditionally enables timed MWAIT, but not all Haswell
steppings support it. In preparation for merging Haswell and Broadwell,
also enable timed MWAIT on Haswell code, but only if it is supported.
Change-Id: I1d11d62f1801d65ae4d5623994fd55fd35e8f34a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46916
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The old code was broken and register 0x90 didn't even exist any more in
the config space of the SMBus PCI device, so just always return the MMIO
base address of the SMBus controller. As far as I've seen, no board in
tree uses this functionality at the moment.
Change-Id: Ib80d5c928da6022427afb8ccc969fb2aac953c2d
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reported-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49121
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to a bootblock gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Change-Id: Iad40b6315a29e7aea612a3e1a169372d296d1d6c
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49443
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I357099f797be178543a9e6637335cd0a68633071
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49441
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I8b30eb5d70c34ae3e2ed24ab52dd1357a54c5ae7
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49439
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I0b956427a9cec56d06b03f7f05138f75137b4ea3
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49437
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ibc727302109456eb1d86652c947ce85b3a64c5b2
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49436
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I80369ab70d5510cb4f388f3029119e7148361af4
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49435
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to a early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Id6b55d7f3d3fbfc5b55497708f24006614760d03
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49434
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I130fd26944169430a84c3609432b1b5283581c99
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49432
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ie3878b47b8e20c51b928a38df9ccedf2d50d478e
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49431
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ib19a4f64eaf25bf2eb47ee60748a68538fc0729a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49430
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I279956f30cbb6fb031cdfe6aaa09b644b6b7d3e7
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49427
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The LPC/eSPI pad configuration is already done at board-level. Thus,
drop redundant configuration by dropping the call to lpc_configure_pads.
Change-Id: Ib9e62bf19e6f1fbe32a340e4802c13504a0d6def
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49417
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: Ie1e53e72c65fdcfe4be2e01134873aa7858c28ff
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49416
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms.
This is done by adding one missing pad to the early gpio table and
dropping the call to the soc function.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: I210633d4520fcfab59f68268bd7991557433ce38
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49415
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: If0693a4419c58dde3c4536698940f03c30304b9d
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49414
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms.
This is done by adding missing pads to the bootblock gpio table.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: I95993b1bd4f1fd8b4ac7b21fb89ec4d196b0240a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49412
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I62ffbe36bd7b7675aa0f41a8c6e9214d04ad4ae5
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49428
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early gpio table for the board as a
first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I6fedcebea3bb31d992bac1e3b21382fea93a8b82
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49429
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: Ieeb738afd54e77ee853ee109009f611411aa0d4a
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49426
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I5482f44b361925b7d2dbcbf1065c1be035c68b0b
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49424
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Do early pad configuration in early bootblock before console init, to
make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any
other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence
behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I7dcf88d61c305f0598a0a79f8cfa46ef5009564b
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49419
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by
adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock.
The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410.
Change-Id: Ie33bae481f430a1c4410a0a4e2b2a34a3e78adaa
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49411
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The `mobile` suffix is misleading, since desktop CPUs share the same
CPUIDs. Remove unused stepping IDs and add the full CPUIDs instead.
Finally, add Broadwell CPUIDs in preparation for merging CPU code.
Note that steppings for Haswell in various comments are incorrect.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 remains identical.
Change-Id: I19e56b8826b1514550ae95e6363b0df2d08e3cb7
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46915
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Backport Broadwell's s0ix support to Haswell in preparation to unify
both platforms' CPU code. Note that only ULT variants support s0ix.
This option is currently unused, but will be put to use in subsequent
commits, when switching Broadwell mainboards to use Haswell's CPU code.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 remains identical.
Change-Id: I91c6f937c09c9254a6f698f3a6fb6366364e3b2b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46924
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
The `clear` command for SMMSTORE version 1 does not require a parameter.
Change-Id: I992b7ce5962bf7ee62b7e1970ae7aa1b975ef42e
Signed-off-by: Tim Crawford <tcrawford@system76.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49724
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Soller <jeremy@system76.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Allow MRC training in SA GV.
BUG=b:177779469
BRANCH=firmware-volteer-13672.B
TEST=Built and booted into OS.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Chang <kevin.chang@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: Idc9f634135b489450f53f8cd28d80649309d0f70
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49636
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Assigned USB2 port to type-c use.
BUG=b:177483060
BRANCH=firmware-volteer-13672.B
TEST=Built and booted into OS.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Chang <kevin.chang@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: I9bd820406124927d56296508be05033217c0d472
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49638
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
On FSP1.1 platform cbmem_initiailze() is called in
chipset_teardown_car_main(). This causes double
call op cbmem_initialize().
Add call to cbmem_online() to avoid double CBMEM init.
BUG = N/A
TEST = Build and boot on Facebook FBG1701
Change-Id: I449ddfc94f1099d7c0e9005e6a5cf509e1433bb1
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49646
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
prog_locate() will load FSP, before CBMEM is initialized.
The vboot workbuffer is used for loading, but
CBMEM_ID_VBOOT_WORKBUF is not available.
A NULL pointer is returned as workbuffer resulting in error
'Ramstage was not loaded!' at second boot.
Initialize CBMEM before calling prog_locate().
BUG = N/A
TEST = Build and boot on Facebook FBG1701
Change-Id: I2f04a326a95840937b71f6ad65a7c011268ec6d6
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49639
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
For the time being every soc/intel selects ACPI_SOC_NVS
and pwrs is a required field for the common initialisation
implementation of followup work.
Change-Id: I4a0c7eb35f0646898e49fad15c6448607c398731
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49493
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
0 is converted to not used, so use a special value to allow using PCIe
root port #1.
Change-Id: I2d64afc9bb4627913492edad8f36566e7fb18166
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Soller <jeremy@system76.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Crawford <tcrawford@system76.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49172
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
This change updates pcie_rp.h to reflow the comment blocks to fit
within 80 columns to match the original style of the file. This
addresses comment received on
CB:49370 (https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49370/comment/0f3fe10d_4e218b5f/).
Change-Id: I565ad602e0e3a2ee09e8345479d82e2ce0a31fd0
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49725
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Increase DCACHE_RAM_SIZE to 32kB and remove "NO_CBFS_MCACHE".
It’s quite safe to increase DCACHE_RAM_SIZE. All LGA775 targets
should have at least 256K L2 cache. That is plenty for XIP RO cache of
bootblock + romstage and a 32K CAR.
Change-Id: I393b2727bd90a990c3108a4dbead62b17d7fc531
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49505
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Correct GPIO settings as below reason:
1. GPP_G7 not being used but set to NF.
2. GPP_C22 and GPP_C23 is set to NC but internal pull down to 20K
BUG=b:177283756
BRANCH=dedede
TEST=emerge-dedede coreboot chromeos-bootimage and boot into emmc
Change-Id: Idf25674efa2336bde98c5abaff278484fd71ea8b
Signed-off-by: Stanley Wu <stanley1.wu@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49348
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Henry Sun <henrysun@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Correct GPIO settings as below reason:
1. GPP_D19/GPP_D20/GPP_D21 not being used but set to NF.
2. GPP_B7 should configure as WWAN SAR detect ODL, but set to NC
BUG=b:175932166
BRANCH=dedede
TEST=emerge-dedede coreboot chromeos-bootimage and boot into emmc
Signed-off-by: Stanley Wu <stanley1.wu@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: Id7780d5332551ed3fd20ef14f8b5d31164f16385
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49645
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Angel Pons